This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information. |
Alameda County, CA | February 4, 2014 Election |
Sanitary Sewer System and Sewer FundBy Tim RoodCandidate for Council Member; City of Piedmont | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
I support completing the phased rehabilitation of the remaining 1/3 of Piedmont's sanitary sewer mains using low-cost state loans. The projected sewer fund shortfall could be covered by borrowing from the General Fund and repaying the debt when the sewer fund again shows a surplus, approximately 2023.I was the primary author of the sewer fund section of the 2013 BAFPC report (begins on p. 16), which explored several funding and financing options for addressing the projected, temporary shortfall in the City's sewer fund. We worked closely with the City's Finance and Public Works directors in developing the financial model underlying our analysis. Although Piedmont's current, permanent dedicated sewer tax provides about $2.2 million annually in revenue, the combination of debt service from past phases of rehabilitation, increased regulatory requirements, and the need to rehabilitate the remaining 1/3 or so of the system and reduce the risk of expensive and disruptive sewer failures and emergency repairs all point to a projected, temporary shortfall in the sewer fund between 2016 and 2023. For the past two years, the Budget Advisory & Financial Planning Committee has identified this shortfall as one of the primary financial risks to the City. We unanimously recommended beginning the process of obtaining a low‐interest State loan to restart phased sewer main rehabilitation, which we estimate could save taxpayers $4.4 million compared to continuing patchwork repairs. Funding sources could include a temporary sewer tax surcharge measure, which would require approval of 2/3 of the voters, borrowing from the General Fund to cover the projected shortfall in the Sewer Fund, or some combination of the two. As maintaining the sewer system is a basic and high-priority function of City government, we encouraged the Council to consider borrowing from the General Fund to cover the projected temporary sewer shortfall and to size any proposed surcharge to minimize the burden on taxpayers. The failed Measure A was a 50% surcharge for 10 years, generating over $11 million. But our long-range projections found that the shortfall could be resolved with only $2.3 million in additional revenue. I support full Council investigation of multiple options for addressing this temporary projected shortfall before a new sewer tax measure is placed before the voters. |
Next Page:
Position Paper 3
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
February 2014 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
ca/alm
Created from information supplied by the candidate: January 13, 2014 11:47
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright ©
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.