This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/la/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Los Angeles County, CA March 8, 2011 Election
Charter Amendment LA-G
Pension Reform
City of Los Angeles

Charter Amendment - Majority Approval Required
Official Results

Pass: 158,927 / 75.1% Yes votes ...... 52,662 / 24.9% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Information shown below: Summary | Fiscal Impact | Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

Shall the Charter be amended: (1) to provide sworn Fire, Police, and Harbor Department employees, who are hired on or after July 1, 2011, with the pension benefits provided in the Fire and Police Pension Plan-Tier 6; and (2) to modify provisions of the Fire and Police Pension Plan in order to facilitate compliance with state and federal laws, to authorize the Council to establish an Excess Benefit Plan, to allow flexibility in establishing amortization policies, and to make technical changes?

Summary Prepared by
Ballot Simplification Committee:
THE SITUATION:

Pension Plan funding is from employee contributions, City contributions, and Pension Fund investments. There are five Plan tiers. New employees currently become members of Tier 5, which provides:

  • A minimum 50% pension at age 50 with 20 years service and maximum 90% pension with 33 years service;
  • Required employee contributions of 8% or 9% of salary with no contributions for retiree health benefits; and
  • A pension based on the single highest year salary.

THE PROPOSAL:

This measure would create Tier 6 and make other Plan modifications. Tier 6 would apply to Plan members hired on or after July 1, 2011 and would provide:

  • A minimum 40% pension at age 50 with 20 years service and maximum 90% pension with 33 years service;
  • Required employee contributions of 9% of salary plus an additional 2% of salary to help offset the City'S contribution toward retiree health benefits; and
  • A pension based on the highest two year salary average.

A YES VOTE MEANS:

You want to establish a new pension tier for new sworn employees in the Fire, Police and Harbor Departments and make other modifications to the Plan.

A NO VOTE MEANS:

You do not want to establish a new pension tier for new sworn employees in the Fire, Police and Harbor Departments and make other modifications to the Plan.

Fiscal Impact from Miguel A. Santana
City Administrative Officer:
Based on studies conducted by the independent actuary for the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pension System, adoption of this measure will reduce the City's future pension costs for new sworn public safety employees. Assuming the City continues to hire public safety employees to maintain its current workforce, the City is estimated to save approximately $152 million over the next 10 years.

Official Sources of Information

Impartial Analysis from Gerry F. Miller
Chief Legislative Analyst
This measure would amend the provisions of the Charter relating to the Fire and Police Pension Plan (Plan) by: (1) establishing a new tier (Tier 6) of benefits for sworn employees of the Fire, Police and Harbor Departments hired on or after July 1, 2011, and (2) modifying provisions of the Plan to facilitate compliance with state and federal law, authorizing Council to establish an Excess Benefit Plan, and giving the Board of Fire and Police Pension Commissioners the authority to establish funding policies.

Currently there are five benefit Tiers in the Plan for sworn employees of the Fire Department and Police Department, with Tier 5 also applicable to sworn employees of the Harbor Department. New sworn employees become members of Tier 5 and the majority of Plan members are in Tier 5.

The Plan is funded by employee contributions, returns on investments, and City contributions. During the recent recession, returns on investments declined sharply due to the downturn in financial markets. As a result, City contributions to the Plan have been increasing to make up the shortfall. This means less funds are available for other City programs, resulting in reductions in staffing and service levels.

This measure would create Tier 6 which would apply to police officers in the Police and Harbor Departments and firefighters in the Fire Department, hired on or after July 1, 2011. Significant provisions of Tier 6 compared to the current Tier 5 pension plan include a reduction in pension benefits for early retirement, setting employee contributions at 9% of salary rather than the current 8% or 9% of salary depending on funding levels, and requiring a 2% contribution from employees towards retiree health care. Following is a comparison of Tier 5 and Tier 6:


Minimum Age:
Pension Rates:

Employee Contribution:
Employee Health Contribution:

Final Compensation:
Tier 5
50
Min 50% with 20 yrs
Max 90% with 33 yrs
8% or 9%

0%

Highest one year average salary
Tier 6
50
Min 40% with 20 yrs
Max 90% with 33 yrs
9%

2% to offset City health contribution
Highest two year average salary

This measure would also provide other modifications to the Charter that would:

  • Facilitate the City's ability to comply with changes to federal and state laws applicable to government pension plans.

  • Authorize the Council to establish an Excess Benefit Plan. The Internal Revenue Code establishes limitations on pension benefits. In some cases this may impact the benefits received by members of the Plan. In such cases, the Internal Revenue Code also provides for the establishment of a "qualified governmental excess benefit arrangement." Such a plan currently exists in the City for members of Tier
    5. This measure would allow the Council to establish an Excess Benefit Plan for Tier 6 as long as it is substantially the same as the existing Excess Benefits Plan for Tier 5.

  • Provide the Board of Fire and Police Pension Commissioners with the authority to establish and adjust funding policies.

This measure will become effective if approved by a majority of voters.

  Nonpartisan Information

Ballotpedia
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Charter Amendment LA-G
REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST CHARTER AMENDMENT G

The rising cost of public pensions is crippling cities' ability to provide critical public services.  Los Angeles must get serious about curtailing out-of-control pension obligations.

VOTE YES ON MEASURE G TO REFORM L.A.'S BROKEN PENSION SYSTEM.

Measure G will reform the pension system for new public safety employees, and is projected to save the City of Los Angeles $173 million for every 1,000 new cops and firefighters hired.  Current sworn personnel will still get the pension benefits they were promised.

VOTE YES ON MEASURE G TO IMPROVE PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES

Measure G is designed to encourage sworn personnel to stay on the job longer because it requires more years of service to qualify for certain pension benefits.  Residents will benefit from a more stable and experienced public safety force. 

Please join us in supporting responsible pension reform by voting YES on MEASURE G.

PERSONS SIGNING REBUTTAL TO THE ARGUMENT AGAINST CHARTER AMENDMENT G

ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA
 Mayor
City of Los Angeles

ERIC GARCETTI
Council President
City of Los Angeles

JAN C. PERRY
Council President Pro Tempore
City of Los Angeles

COUNCILMAN DENNIS P. ZINE
Reserve Officer, LAPD
City of Los Angeles

BERNARD C. PARKS
Councilmember, 8th District
City of Los Angeles

COUNCILMAN DENNIS P. ZINE
Reserve Officer, LAPD
City of Los Angeles

BERNARD C. PARKS
Councilmember, 8th District
City of Los Angeles

(No arguments against Charter Amendment LA-G were submitted)


Los Angeles Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: September 13, 2011 11:10 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.