This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Alameda County, CA November 2, 2010 Election
Measure S
Tax on medical cannabis businesses
City of Berkeley

Majority Approval Required

Pass: 33260 / 82.97% Yes votes ...... 6825 / 17.03% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Jan 6 2:56pm, 100.00% of Precincts Reporting (99/99)
Information shown below: Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

Shall a tax be authorized on medical cannabis businesses not exceeding $25 per $1000 of gross receipts phased in over two years; on nonprofit medical cannabis businesses not exceeding $25.00 per square foot for the first 3000 square feet and $10 per foot thereafter; and on non-medical cannabis businesses of $100 per $1000 gross receipts; and shall the City's appropriations limit be increased to permit expenditure of these tax proceeds?

Official Sources of Information

Impartial Analysis from City Attorney
Medical cannabis dispensaries in Berkeley are currently taxed at the rate applicable to all retail businesses, or $1.20 per $1000 of the prior year's gross receipts. This measure would authorize the City Council to increase the tax rate on medical cannabis businesses to $25 per $1000 of gross receipts. The tax would be phased in over two years, with a rate of $18 per $1000 of gross receipts for the last six months of 2010 payable in 2011, and $25 per $1000 of gross receipts in 2011, payable in 2012. If the "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010", on the November 2010 state ballot passes the rate would stay at $18 per $1000.

If non-medical cannabis businesses are allowed by the "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010", on the November 2010 state ballot, they would be taxed at the rate of $100 per $1000 of gross receipts.

If a cannabis business (whether medical or non-medical) were to obtain formal non-profit status from the state or federal governments, it would be taxed based on the number of square feet it occupies rather than gross receipts. The square foot rate would be capped at $25 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet, and $10 per square foot for all square feet over 3,000. These rate caps would be reduced to $12.50 and $5.00, respectively, if the "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010", on the November 2010 state ballot passes and takes effect. All square foot rates could be increased annually by the greater of the increase in the cost of living in the immediate San Francisco Bay Area or per capita personal income growth in the state, as verified by official United States Bureau of Labor statistics.

The Council could impose any tax authorized by this measure at a lower rate, as well as and exempt Cannabis Businesses from the tax if they have gross receipts below a specified amount.

The Council would also be authorized to adopt different tax rates for medical and non-medical cannabis businesses.

This measure would increase the City's appropriations limit by the aggregate sum authorized to be levied for each of the four fiscal years FY 2012 through FY 2015.

This measure does not legalize cannabis businesses, but only taxes businesses that are otherwise permitted.

Financial Implications

Based on current reported gross receipts, it is anticipated that the gross receipts tax on medical cannabis businesses would raise in excess of $165,000 in 2011 and $460,000 in 2012 and subsequent years, depending on gross receipts. It is impossible to anticipate the amount of tax proceeds this would raise if non-medical cannabis businesses if they are legalized by the "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010", on the November 2010 state ballot and permitted in Berkeley.

Based on the square feet occupied by existing reported medical cannabis businesses in Berkeley, the square foot tax would raise approximately $159,655, subject to annual inflation.

/s/

ZACH COWAN

Berkeley City Attorney

 
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure S Arguments Against Measure S
VOTE YES ON MEASURE S - THE MEDICAL CANNABIS TAX

California voters authorized the use of medical cannabis in 1996 - in a ballot initiative overwhelmingly supported by Berkeley voters. In 2008, the voters of Berkeley again demonstrated support for increased patient access for medical cannabis with the passage of Measure JJ.

Like other cities, the City of Berkeley is working to create zoning, licensing and tax regulations for medical cannabis cultivation and dispensaries. Berkeley's business tax system does not yet have a category for medical cannabis cultivation, dispensing, and ancillary activities such as baking and product development.

Measure S creates a new business tax classification and rate for cannabis cultivators, dispensaries, and ancillary activities. It establishes a rate of $25 per $1000 of gross receipts, phased in over two years. For non-profits, the rate is $25 per square foot for the first 3000 square feet and $10 per foot thereafter. If State Proposition 19 passes, legalizing cannabis, this measure will permit the City to levy $100 per $1000 gross receipts for non-medical cannabis businesses.

The Cannabis Tax will provide new revenue for city services and may be used for any legal municipal purpose, such as public safety, street repair and public health programs. State law in California requires that any new business tax rate must be approved by the voters.

Measure S is supported unanimously by the Berkeley City Council and by the medical cannabis community, and will help support and maintain essential services for our city.

VOTE YES ON MEASURE S

Tom Bates

Berkeley Mayor

Darryl Moore

Berkeley City Council, District 2

Maxwell G. Anderson, Jr.

Berkeley City Council District 3

Susan Wengraf

City Council member, District 6

Gordon Wozniak

Berkeley City Council - District 8

No argument against Measure S was submitted.


Alameda Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 6, 2011 14:57 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.