This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/la/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure E Emergency Neighborhood School and Teacher Retention Measure Los Angeles Unified School District Parcel Tax - 2/3 Approval Required Fail: 198,586 / 52.95% Yes votes ...... 176,459 / 47.05% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Results as of Jul 2 1:59pm, 100.00% of Precincts Reporting (2,193/2,193) |
Information shown below: Summary | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | |||||
To offset severe state budget cuts; promote student achievement in reading/mathematics/science/arts; maintain vocational education/job training programs; limit class size increases; reduce teacher/staff layoffs; keep schools safe/bathrooms clean; shall the Los Angeles Unified School District levy a temporary $100 annual education parcel tax ending after four years, exempting low-income seniors, no money for central district administrators' salaries, mandatory audits, with all funds going to neighborhood schools?
Should the Los Angeles Unified School District ("LAUSD") levy a temporary $100 annual education parcel tax? The Situation The LAUSD is the second largest school district in the nation. In addition to the city of Los Angeles, the LAUSD includes schools in a number of neighboring cities, such as San Fernando, Bell, Huntington Park, Gardena and others. The District's budget comes primarily from state and federal sources, and is particularly sensitive to changes in state funding. The LAUSD faces a $640 million shortfall in its 2010-2011 budget.
The law (Proposition 13 of 1978) does not allow local districts to levy a tax based on the value ("ad valorem") of the property being taxed, but does allow Districts to levy a parcel tax, which is not based on the value of the property, if approved by a 2/3 majority vote. Proposal
Measure E would authorize a $100 per year parcel tax, to be levied on every parcel of taxable real property in the District that receives a separate tax bill. The tax would be levied for a four-year period, beginning on July 1, 2010 and ending on July 1, 2014.
A Senior Citizen tax exemption could be granted on any parcel owned and occupied as a principal residence by one or more low-income persons age 65 or over. Fiscal Effects The tax is expected to generate $95.2 million in each of the four years in which it is in effect. A YES vote means: The owners of each taxable property within the boundaries of the LAUSD (with the exception of those who qualify for the Senior Citizen exemption) would pay a tax of $100 per year for four years, from July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2014. A NO vote means: This tax would not be levied, and the District would not receive the additional $95.2 million per year. Supporters Say
The Tax revenues would be used for working towards every student achieving reading at grade level, reducing additional teacher layoffs, including math, science and English teachers, keeping bathrooms and schools clean and safe, maintaining vocational education and job training programs, forestalling further increases in class size, and alleviating cuts to school police officers, counselors and nurses. An exemption from the Tax may be granted on any parcel owned by one or more low-income persons 65 years of age or over who occupies the parcel as a principal residence, upon application. A parcel of taxable real property is any unit of real property in the District that receives a separate tax bill for ad valorem property taxes from the Los Angeles County Treasurer and Tax Collector. All property that is otherwise exempt from or on which no ad valorem property taxes are levied in any year shall also be exempt from the Tax in such year. The Los Angeles County Assessor's determination of exemption or relief of any parcel from taxation shall be final and binding for purposes of the Tax. The proceeds of the Tax shall be applied only for the specific purposes identified in the Measure, and shall be deposited into a separate account. No later than January 1 of each year while the tax is in effect, commencing January 1, 2011, the chief fiscal officer of the District shall prepare and file with the Board a report detailing the amount of funds collected and expended during the prior fiscal year, and the status of any project or description of any program authorized by this Measure. The Taxes levied under this Measure shall be collected by the Los Angeles County Treasurer and Tax Collector at the same time and manner, and subject to the same penalties, as ad valorem property taxes. Unpaid taxes shall bear interest at the same rate as the rate for unpaid ad valorem property taxes. The collection of the Tax shall not decrease the funds available from other sources of the District. This Measure requires a two-thirds (2/3) vote for passage.
|
Official Information
|
Arguments For Measure E | Arguments Against Measure E | ||
Our local schools face a serious crisis. Local and statewide budget cuts are
damaging our schools' ability to provide a higher-quality education for students.
Over the past two years, the state legislature has cut $1.3 billion from local schools, and is expected to cut several hundred million dollars more. In total, these unprecedented cuts will have forced our schools to lose more than 8,000 essential school employees, including 4,000 teachers. As a result, class size at every grade level and at every school has increased. Now class sizes in LA Unified neighborhood schools are among the nation's highest. Without additional funds, neighborhood schools will have to make even deeper cuts including reducing the number of school police and truancy officers that keep kids safe, in school, away from gangs and drugs, and make surrounding neighborhoods safer. Also, school nurses, counselors and other school employees essential to student health will be cut. Measure E will provide emergency funding to help our local schools weather this crisis. Measure E will raise the parcel tax for property owners by $100 a year + just $8.33 a month. Measure E is temporary + it ends in four years. Measure E funds will be used to:
NO money from the measure will go towards central district administrators' salaries. Vote YES on Measure E.
JAMES REAM
ALTHEA FORD
RAMON CORTINES
LEILANI SINCLAIR
JOSE L. NAVARRO IV
Everyone is struggling during these tough times, but good times or bad, the LAUSD bureaucrats want more. If Measure E passes, it will be the 6th time the district has raised taxes in the last 13 years. The LAUSD says the need for more of your money is urgent. Without it, the District will not be able to make ends meet. They want you to feel stingy if you don't agree to give them more. So how much do you think they have to spend? You have probably heard it's about $10,000 per child. But that would be wrong, according to a just released study by the CATO institute. The actual number is over $25,000! Looks like the taxpayers are already extremely generous! (Check for yourself at http://www.cato.org -- the report is called "They Spend WHAT? The Real Cost of Public School.") Why the huge difference between what we hear and what the District actually spends? It's because, like many school districts, the LAUSD excludes whole categories of expenditures that are necessary for schools to function, such as capital costs, debt service, and employee benefits. Don't let the LAUSD bureaucrats take advantage of taxpayers again. Tell them to shape up and do a better job of managing the billions of dollars they already are getting from us. Vote NO on Measure E!
JON COUPAL
TREVOR GRIMM | HIGHER TAX ALERT!
Homeowners: Can you afford another tax increase? If Measure E passes, your taxes will go up! Renters: Can you afford higher rent? If Measure E passes your landlord could be pressed to raise your rent to pay the tax! Voters have been very generous to the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), approving 5 bond measures in the last 13 years, for a total of $20 billion dollars. Many homeowners are now paying hundreds upon hundreds of dollars in higher taxes to repay these bonds... for a massive school construction program that goes forward even though District enrollment has been declining. Now, LAUSD administrators what you to pay even more. At a time when unemployment is well over 12% and home foreclosures are at record highs, the last thing struggling taxpayers need is higher taxes. Don't be fooled. The LAUSD bureaucrats always want more. Why? A.J. Duffy, president of the teachers union, said it best when he spoke to the Los Angeles Daily News last year. "This district has lived high on its hog for 10 to 12 years, while continuing to raise administrative and supervisory personnel even while student populations were going down," Duffy said. "Now it's coming back to harm them." These are tough times for everyone, especially taxpayers. Don't raise your taxes to bail out the LAUSD bureaucrats again. Vote NO on Measure E!
JON COUPAL
TREVOR GRIMM
Superintendent-initiated reform efforts reduced the size of the central district office and promoted local control to create community-directed neighborhood schools. This includes sending funds directly to neighborhood schools, giving parents, teachers, and principals more decision-making control over how to improve education in their neighborhood schools. Please help our local schools survive this crisis. Vote YES on Measure E.
FORD ROOSEVELT
JILL BANKS BARAD
VICTORIA RIERDAN HURLEY
ROBERTO GONZALEZ
ESTHER SOLIMAN |