Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Measure B.
Orange County Public Safety Sales Tax Eligibility Ordinance
-- County of Orange
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
204125 /
34.4% Yes votes ......
388694 /
65.6% No votes
- Shall the ordinance requiring that the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues be
allocated by the County only to eligible public safety services, defined as public safety services
provided by the County of Orange, specifically the County Probation Department, including its
juvenile hall detention facilities and its adult and juvenile offenders' monitoring programs; the
County Sheriff-Coroner, including its adult correctional facilities, investigative divisions,
specialized patrol functions and coroner investigation teams; the County District Attorney,
including its prosecution and investigative units, and County lifeguards, be adopted?
- Measure C.
Orange County Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund Ordinance
-- County of Orange
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
161530 /
27.7% Yes votes ......
422195 /
72.3% No votes
- Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues
from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Homeland Security
Infrastructure Fund and establishing the Homeland Security Infrastructure Oversight Committee,
as described herein: commencing in fiscal year 2006-2007, $10 million would be allocated to
the Homeland Security Infrastructure Fund ("Homeland Security Fund"); in fiscal year 2009-
2010 and every fiscal year thereafter, the County's $10 million allocation to the Homeland
Security Fund will increase or decrease by the same percentage as the prior fiscal year's increase
or decrease in the amount of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues the County receives that is not
allocated to cities ("County's Share"); this ordinance would create the Homeland Security
Infrastructure Fund Oversight Committee, consisting of the County Sheriff, County District
Attorney, Board of Supervisor's Chairman, Orange County Fire Chiefs' Association President
and Orange County Police Chiefs' and Sheriffs' Association President; the Oversight Committee
will submit to the County an annual recommendation for allocation of the Homeland Security
Fund to public safety service providers authorized by California law to receive those funds; the
remainder of the County's Proposition 172 funds may be allocated by the County to eligible
public safety services as defined by the ordinance to mean those provided by the County of
Orange, specifically the County Probation Department, including its juvenile hall detention
facilities and its adult and juvenile offenders' monitoring programs; the County Sheriff-Coroner,
including its adult correctional facilities, investigative divisions, specialized patrol functions and
coroner investigation teams; the County District Attorney, including its prosecution and
investigative units, and County lifeguards, be adopted?
- Measure D.
Initiative Reallocating a Portion of County's Proposition 172 Funds from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Fire Authority
-- County of Orange
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
160711 /
27.0% Yes votes ......
433868 /
73.0% No votes
- Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues
from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the Orange County Fire Authority
("OCFA"), a joint powers agency serving 43% of the County's population in 22 of 34 cities and
unincorporated territory, utilizing the following formula: the amount of Proposition 172 sales tax
revenues the County receives that is not allocated to cities ("County's Share") in fiscal year
2004-2005 ("Base Year Amount") would be subtracted from the County's Share, beginning with
the 2005-2006 fiscal year; if the resulting figure is a positive number, 50% of that amount would
be allocated to OCFA, and 50% plus the Base Year Amount would be allocated to the County for
allocation to public safety providers as provided by California law; however, for any year that
the Base Year Amount is greater than the County's Share, OCFA would not be entitled to
receive any of the County Share; the allocation formula would change once the amount paid to
OCFA in any fiscal year equals 10% of the County's Share; thereafter, 10% of the County's
Share would be allocated to OCFA, and 90% would be available for allocation by the County to
public safety providers as provided by California law, be adopted?
- Measure E.
Ordinance to Reallocate Public Safety Sales Tax Funds to the Operation of Juvenile Detention Facilities and Monitoring of Juvenile Offenders and Adult Criminals on Probation by the Orange County Probation Department
-- County of Orange
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
183130 /
31.4% Yes votes ......
399250 /
68.6% No votes
- Shall the ordinance shifting a portion of the County's Proposition 172 sales tax revenues
from the County Sheriff-Coroner and District Attorney to the County Probation Department,
utilizing the following formula: commencing with the 2005-2006 fiscal year and for each fiscal
year thereafter, 5% of the County's share of Proposition 172 sales tax revenues during each such
fiscal year will be allocated to the Probation Department and the remaining 95% would be
available for allocation by the County to public safety service providers authorized by California
law to receive those funds, be adopted?
- Measure F.
School Repair and Construction Bond of 2005
-- Newport-Mesa Unified School District
(55% Approval Required)
Pass:
26123 /
56.1% Yes votes ......
20401 /
43.9% No votes
-
- Measure G.
Utility Users Tax
-- City of La Habra
(Majority Approval Required)
Fail:
5147 /
47.4% Yes votes ......
5701 /
52.6% No votes
-
|
|
News and Analysis
The Los Angeles Times
Orange County Register
(Registration may be required. You may login as smartvoter, password "smartvoter".)
The Daily Pilot
Nonpartisan Analysis
League of Women Voter, Orange County
Others
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|