Should the "Three Strikes" law be limited to violent and/or serious felonies?
Permits limited re-sentencing under new definitions. Increases
punishment for specified sex crimes against children.
- Amends "Three Strikes" law to require increased sentences only when current conviction is for specified violent and/or serious felony.
- Redefines violent and serious felonies. Only prior convictions for specified violent and/or serious felonies, brought and tried separately, would qualify for second and third "strike" sentence increases.
- Allows conditional re-sentencing of persons with sentences increased under "Three Strikes" law if previous sentencing offenses, resulting in the currently charged felony/felonies, would no longer qualify as violent and/or serious felonies.
- Increases punishment for specified sex crimes against children.
Over the long run, net state savings of up to several
hundred million dollars annually, primarily to the prison system;
local jail and court-related costs of potentially more than
ten million dollars annually.
- A YES vote of this measure means:
- The current "Three
Strikes" sentencing law would
be amended to require that a
second and third strike offense
be a serious or violent felony,
instead of any felony, in order
for the longer sentences
required under Three Strikes
to apply. The state would be
required to resentence "third
strikers" whose third strike was
nonviolent and nonserious. In
addition, prison sentences for
specified sex offenses against
children would be lengthened.
- A NO vote of this measure means:
- Current sentencing
law would remain in effect,
requiring offenders with one
or more prior convictions for
serious or violent felonies to
receive longer sentences for
the conviction of any new
felony (not just a serious or
violent felony). In addition,
prison sentences for certain
sex offenses against children
would remain unchanged.
- Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 66:
- PROPOSITION 66 RESTORES
THREE STRIKES TO ITS
ORIGINAL INTENT--ensuring
criminals currently serving time
for violent offenses are kept in
prison, SAVING TAXPAYERS
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS currently
wasted imprisoning shoplifters
and other nonviolent,
petty offenders for life.
PROPOSITION 66 PROTECTS
CHILDREN WITH TOUGHER
1-STRIKE SENTENCES FOR
CHILD MOLESTERS. YES ON
PROPOSITION 66.
Full Text of Argument In Favor
- Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 66:
- Proposition 66 is opposed by
Governor Schwarzenegger, the
Attorney General, all 58
District Attorneys, the state's
leading law enforcement, taxpayer,
and child protection
groups. Costs millions and
threatens public safety by creating
a legal loophole that
could release an estimated
26,000 convicted felons--
including rapists, child
molesters, and murderers.
http://www.Keep3Strikes.org
Full Text of Argument Against
- Contact FOR Proposition 66:
- Jim Benson
Citizens Against Violent Crime
1625 E. 17th Street, #105
Santa Ana, CA 92705
1-866-3STRIKES
cavcjim@sbcglobal.net
http://www.voteyeson66.org
- Contact AGAINST Proposition 66:
- Californians United for Public Safety
campaign3@Keep3Strikes.org
http://www.noProp66.org
|
|
Official Information
Secretary of State
Campaign Finance Information
Legislative Analysts's Office
Nonpartisan Information
Easy Voter Guide
League of Women Voters - Analysis
Other organizations
League of Women Voters - Background
Events
League of Women Voters
Televised Forum
- Peninsula TV, Channel 30
Wednesday, October 6th - 9 AM
Friday, October 8th - 7 PM
Saturday, October 23rd - 10 PM
Saturday, October 30th - 6 PM
Monday, November 1st - 8 PM
LWV Pros & Cons Public Meetings
- Come to a meeting in your community where League experts discuss all state ballot propositions giving a nonpartisan analysis. Consult your Smart Voter county page for dates, times and locations.
News and Analysis
KQED-FM: Forum Talk Show
- Proposition 66
- with host Michael Krasny and guests
10/27/04. (Opens in new window)
California Connected
LA36 (Los Angeles Cable TV)
- Voter Minute
- a video guide (with transcript) to help you decide (Windows Media Player; opens in new window)
Google News Search
Partisan Information
FOR Prop 66
AGAINST Prop 66
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|