This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/cc/ for current information. |
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
| ||||
|
||||
Measure R Charter Amendment City of Richmond Majority Approval Required 18,620 / 69.0% Yes votes ...... 8,364 / 31.0% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||
|
Results as of Dec 15 1:28pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (57/57) 82.9% Voter Turnout (418,335/504,505) |
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | ||||
Shall the Charter of the City of Richmond be amended to reduce the number of City Council members from nine to seven effective for the election scheduled for November 2008, as set forth in Section 1 of Exhibit A of City Council Resolution No. 89-04a on file in the office of the City Clerk?
As a result of the reduction of the number of Councilmembers from nine to seven, four members of the Council will be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure R. If you desire a copy of the full text of the measure, it may be obtained from the Richmond City Clerk by calling (510) 620-6514, and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.
|
|
Arguments For Measure R | Arguments Against Measure R |
Vote yes on Measure R for a smaller, less expensive, leaner, more efficient City Council.
Although Richmond Councilmembers love their jobs, they voted to let voters decide to cut the Council's size. Councilmembers wouldn't have risked their positions, unless reducing the Council's size from 9 to 7 was truly necessary:
Having about twice as many people in our canoe as any other Contra Costa city is causing it to sink. Some have argued this reduction will hurt ethnic diversity on Richmond's Council. This argument insults the intelligence of Richmond's voters, who have historically elected an ethnically diverse Council. Some voters may feel there's a better way to reduce Council size. Measure R may be improved later. Meanwhile, it's an important step in the right direction. Have you ever tried making plans with nine people? It's no easier for the nine person Council to make plans for Richmond. In our difficult financial times, we can't afford the expense and inefficiency of having too many Councilmembers. Vote yes on measure R. Jim Rogers, Councilmember, City of Richmond Mindell Penn, Councilmember, City of Richmond Tom Butt, Councilmember, City of Richmond
| None filed
|