Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Measure D.
Bonds
-- Cabrillo Community College District
(55% Majority Approval Required)
43,470 /
62.0% Yes votes ......
26,643 /
38.0% No votes
- To train and prepare students for jobs and
transfer to four-year universities and improve
safety by providing: Classrooms for healthcare
and job training programs; a university and career
readiness center; improved math, science, arts,
English and other instructional facilities; and by
upgrading, acquiring, constructing, equipping
buildings, sites and classrooms, shall Cabrillo
Community College District issue $118,500,000 in
bonds, at legal rates, with citizen oversight, guaranteed
annual audits and no money for administrators'
salaries?
- Measure E.
Bonds
-- Live Oak Elementary School District
(55% Majority Required)
4,446 /
72.9% Yes votes ......
1,654 /
27.1% No votes
- In order to upgrade electrical, heating and
plumbing systems; replace fire alarms and
other safety systems; modernize classrooms;
fix leaky roofs, and to qualify for state matching funds,
shall the Live Oak School District be authorized to
renovate, repair, modernize and acquire property for
school/joint-use facilities and issue $14,500,000 in
bonds at interest rates within the legal limit with no
funds for administrator salaries and an appointed
Independent Citizens Oversight Committee to monitor
all bond expenditures?
- Measure F.
City Sales Tax
-- City of Santa Cruz
(Majority Approval Required)
12,995 /
69.0% Yes votes ......
5,828 /
31.0% No votes
- Shall a temporary sales tax rate increase of one-quarter
of one percent, which will end after five years, be
adopted to help limit further budget cuts in the City's
General Fund?
- Measure I.
Parcel Tax
-- Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School District
(Majority Approval Required)
901 /
64.5% Yes votes ......
495 /
35.5% No votes
- Shall the Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary School
District continue for four years (July 1, 2004 to June 30,
2008) the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved
by the voters in 2000, thus allowing the district to
continue to use the revenue generated by the existing
special tax of $150 per parcel?
|
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|