LWV League of Women Voters of California
Smart Voter
Alameda County, CA November 5, 2002 Election
Measure S
Mayor and City Council Salary Increase
City of Fremont

City Ordinance

13149 / 35.2% Yes votes ...... 24168 / 64.8% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Nov 15 4:54pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (117/117)
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

Shall an ordinance be adopted that increases the salary of each member of the City Council from $1,407 per month to $2,083 per month and increases the salary of the Mayor from $2,211 per month to $2,916 per month?

Impartial Analysis from the City Attorney
Measure S, on the November 5, 2002 election ballot, would increase the salary of the Mayor and City Council Members. It proposes to increase the salary of each Council Member to $2,083 per month ($25,000 annually) and the salary of the Mayor to $2,916 per month ($35,000 annually).

The procedure for setting of salaries for Mayor and City Council is set forth in the California Government Code. The Government Code sets a base salary depending on the population of the City. The City Council may raise that salary in an amount equal to 5% per year since the last increase. The increase would not be effective until the new City Council is seated after the following election. The Government Code provides that the City Council may set the salary of the Mayor and does not limit the amount. In the alternative, the Government Code provides that the voters may set the salaries of the Mayor and City Council and does not limit the amount.

A "yes" vote is a vote to approve setting each of the City Council Member's salary at $2,083 per month ($25,000 annually) and the Mayor's at $2,916 per month ($35,000 annually). A "no" vote is a vote to disapprove Measure S and retain each City Council Member's salary at $1,407 ($16,884 annually) and the Mayor's at $2,211 ($26,532 annually).
s/HARVEY E. LEVINE

  News and Analysis

Oakland Tribune

Suggest a link related to Measure S
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure S Arguments Against Measure S
One of the most difficult things any of us do is to ask our boss for a raise. We boost our courage and make our argument based on performance, how much work we do, how hard it is, what others make for similar jobs, and, of course, our commitment to the organization. Ultimately, the decision rests on the boss's opinion. You, the citizens of Fremont, are our boss. We have boosted our courage and come before you, hat in hand, to ask for a raise.

State law allows a city to set salaries based on population and permits 5% increases each year. Because Fremont has grown significantly since the salary was first set in 1969, we are much lower than the law would permit today. Had today's population been used to establish the salary base, councilmembers would earn $50,000 and the mayor $75,000, essentially double what this measure authorizes.

Without this measure, a councilmember will earn $16884 and the mayor $26532 next year. The jobs have grown and require much more time than ever, yet the low salary generally permits only self employed or retired people to serve. Last year, the mayor of Fremont was paid less than $20,000 for what has become more than a full time job, approximately what a courtesy clerk at Safeway makes working full time.

Measure S provides a modest increase, bringing salaries to a level where more people might be able to serve. At $25,000 for councilmembers and $35,000 for the mayor, Fremont would still be lower than what is paid in Oakland, Berkeley, San Leandro, Hayward, and San Jose.

By any measure, your city council has earned an increase. To help assure quality candidates in the future and to recognize the value you place in their performance, please vote yes on S.
s/STEVE CHO, Fremont City Councilmember
s/GUS MORRISON, Mayor of Fremont

NO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE S WAS SUBMITTED.


Alameda Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: December 6, 2002 03:14 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.