A "Yes" vote approves, a "No"
vote rejects a 1998 law which authorized certain tribal-state
gaming compacts, provided procedures for future
negotiations with tribes, and designated the Governor to
negotiate with tribes. Fiscal Impact: Probably no significant fiscal impacts on
state and local governments.
- A YES vote of this measure means:
- A state law enacting 11 Indian gambling compacts
would go into effect, but only if Proposition 1A on this ballot is
not approved by the voters. However, if Proposition 1A on
this ballot is approved by the voters, these compacts would
be replaced by newer ones.
- A NO vote of this measure means:
- A state law enacting Indian gambling compacts
would not go into effect.
- Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 29:
- This is a fair agreement on
Indian casinos. This agreement was signed by Indian tribes and
the Governor and ratified by the Legislature in 1998. Now, some
wealthy tribes want to build Las Vegas-style casinos in California
neighborhoods without the safeguards of the 1998
Compacts.
Full Text of Argument In Favor,
Rebuttal
- Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 29:
- Please vote No on this
proposition. Not one Tribe of the more than one hundred
Tribes in California currently supports the compact in
Proposition 29. The overwhelming majority of
California Tribes have signed a subsequent agreement that will
supercede the compact in Proposition 29. Please vote
No on Proposition 29.
Full Text of Argument Against,
Rebuttal
- Contact FOR Proposition 29:
- Art Croney
Committee on Moral Concerns
P. O. Box 2768
Sacramento, CA 95812
(916) 446-5131
http://www.moralconcerns.org
- Contact AGAINST Proposition 29:
- Mr. Gene Raper
Russo, Marsh & Raper
2010 Ainsley Court
Carmichael, CA 95608
(916) 441-3734
|
|
|
Official Information
Secretary of State
Nonpartisan Information
Easy Reading Voter Guide
League of Women Voters
California Voter Foundation
Secretary of State
FAQVoter.com
News and Analysis
Sacramento Bee
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|