|
Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Measure D.
Transient occupancy tax
-- City of Calistoga
(2/3 Approval Required)
 Pass:
1,389 /
79.64% Yes votes ......
355 /
20.36% No votes
- To increase, improve and preserve affordable and workforce
housing in the City of Calistoga, shall an ordinance be adopted to
levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on
hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the
maximum hotel rate from twelve percent (12%) to thirteen percent
(13%), with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $512,325
annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for
affordable and workforce housing?
- Measure E.
Transient occupancy tax
-- City of Saint Helena
(2/3 Approval Required)
Pass:
2,112 /
80.83% Yes votes ......
501 /
19.17% No votes
- To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of St. Helena,
shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on
hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to
13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $279,000 annually) to be restricted to
providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing?
- Measure F.
Transient occupancy tax
-- City of Napa
(2/3 Approval Required)
Pass:
21,263 /
72.07% Yes votes ......
8,241 /
27.93% No votes
- To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and
workforce housing in the City of Napa, shall an
ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient
occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges to
visitors of 30 days or less, increasing the maximum
hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from
the new tax (estimated: $2,100,000 annually) to be
restricted to providing programs and services for
affordable and workforce housing?
- Measure H.
Transient occupancy tax
-- City of American Canyon
(2/3 Approval Required)
 Fail:
4,322 /
66.41% Yes votes ......
2,186 /
33.59% No votes
- To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in the City of American Canyon, shall an ordinance be adopted to levy an ongoing transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel charges, increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new tax (estimated: $140,000 annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable workforce housing?
- Measure I.
Transient occupancy tax
-- County of Napa
(2/3 Approval Required)
Pass:
37,767 /
70.10% Yes votes ......
16,112 /
29.90% No votes
- Shall Ordinance No. 2018-__ be enacted? (To increase, improve, and preserve affordable and workforce housing in Napa County, the Ordinance would increase the existing transient occupancy tax on hotel charges to visitors of 30 days or less in the unincorporated area from 12% to 13%, with all revenue from the 1% increase (estimated: $1.1 million annually) to be restricted to providing programs and services for affordable and workforce housing.)
- Measure R.
Adjust appropriations limit
-- Town of Yountville
(Majority Approval Required)
Pass:
1,044 /
79.03% Yes votes ......
277 /
20.97% No votes
- In order to fully utilize TOT and sales tax
generated from visitors for public services,
parks & recreation, police and fire
emergency programs, shall the
appropriations limit set by Article 13B of the
California Constitution be increased by
$3,000,000 and increase annually by the
growth in TOT each year for a four year
period commencing fiscal year 2018/19? By
approving this appropriation limit, no new
taxes are created nor will any existing tax be
increased.
- Measure S.
Transient occupancy tax
-- Town of Yountville
(2/3 Approval Required)
Pass:
1,003 /
74.24% Yes votes ......
348 /
25.76% No votes
- To increase, improve, and preserve
affordable and workforce housing that
benefits Yountville, shall an ordinance be
adopted to levy an ongoing transient
occupancy tax (hotel tax) of 1% on hotel
charges to visitors of 30 days or less,
increasing the maximum hotel tax rate from
12% to 13%, with all revenue from the new
tax (estimated: $650,000 annually) to be
restricted to providing programs and
services for affordable and workforce
housing?
|
|
|
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
