Should California require random drug testing of doctors, require doctors to check a statewide database before prescribing certain drugs, and raise the cap on noneconomic damages in medical negligence lawsuits?
- Requires drug and alcohol testing of doctors and reporting of positive test to the California
Medical Board.
- Requires Board to suspend doctor pending investigation of positive test and take disciplinary
action if doctor was impaired while on duty.
- Requires doctors to report any other doctor suspected of drug or alcohol impairment or medical
negligence.
- Requires health care practitioners to consult state prescription drug history database before
prescribing certain controlled substances.
- Increases $250,000 cap on pain and suffering damages in medical negligence lawsuits to account
for inflation.
State and local government
costs from raising the cap on medical malpractice damages
ranging from tens of millions to several hundred million dollars
annually, offset to some extent by savings from requirements on
health care providers.
- A YES vote on this measure means:
- The
cap on medical malpractice
damages for such things as
pain and suffering would be
increased from $250,000 to
$1.1
million and adjusted
annually for future inflation.
Health care providers would be
required to check a statewide
prescription drug database
before prescribing or dispensing
certain drugs to a patient for
the first time. Hospitals would
be required to test certain
physicians for alcohol and
drugs.
- A NO vote on this measure means:
- The
cap on medical malpractice
damages for such things as pain
and suffering would remain at
$250,000 and not be subject to
annual inflation adjustments.
Health care providers would
not be required to check a
statewide prescription database
before prescribing or dispensing
drugs. Hospitals would not be
required to test physicians for
alcohol and drugs.
- Summary of Arguments FOR Proposition 46:
- 46 saves lives. It prevents
substance abuse by
doctors and patients and holds
negligent doctors accountable.
Estimates show 18% of health
professionals have an abuse
problem in their lifetimes.
Medical negligence is this
country's third largest cause
of death. Prescription drug
overdoses are epidemic. A cure
is overdue. Vote Yes.
- Summary of Arguments AGAINST Proposition 46:
- Trial lawyers wrote
Prop. 46
to make
millions from medical
malpractice lawsuits. We will
pay, and could lose our trusted
doctors--as many doctors and
specialists are forced to leave
California, moving to states
with more affordable medical-
liability insurance. Protect your
wallet and access to healthcare.
No on 46.
- Contact FOR Proposition 46:
- Your Neighbors For Patient Safety
969 Colorado Boulevard, Suite 103
Los Angeles, CA 90041
(310) 395-2544
info@YesOn46.org
http://www.yeson46.org
- Contact AGAINST Proposition 46:
- No on 46--Patients and
Providers to Protect Access
and Contain Health Costs
1510 J Street, Suite 120
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 706-1001
info@NoOn46.com
http://www.NoOn46.com
|
|
Official Information
Secretary of State
Campaign Finance Data
VotersEdge
- Funding Summary for Prop 46
- the most complete information: everything on this page plus funding, news articles, endorsements, ads. From MapLight and the Smart Voter team of LWV California Education Fund
- Cal-Access
- Details of committee campaign finance filings submitted to the Secretary of State.
Nonpartisan Information
League of Women Voters
Events
Pros & Cons: Santa Clara County
Pros & Cons: Alameda County
- Oct. 27, 7:00 to 9:00 pm, Fremont Main Library, 2400 Stevenson Blvd., Fremont
News and Analysis
KPCC Coverage
KQED News Election Watch
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|