This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information. |
| |||||
| |||||
Candidates Answer Questions on the Issues Council Member; City of Oakland; Council District 2 | |||||
|
The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of Oakland and asked of all candidates for this office.
See below for questions on
Economy,
Prostitution,
Pension Obligations,
Crime
Click on a name for candidate information. See also more information about this contest.
Answer from Abel J Guillen:
Answer from Andrew Park:
Oakland is uniquely situated to attract medium to large businesses, technology hubs, green energy businesses and others. We are a bargain for businesses looking to start, grow or relocate to the Bay Area. We have a talented workforce able to meet the needs and strong college training grounds to prepare future workers. But any effort or incentive offered by the City must include opportunities for Oakland youth and working families to land jobs and contribute to making Oakland an economic power.
The City must be viewed as a government willing to work with businesses to grow the economy and the job base. It doesn't mean that the City becomes a pushover for businesses with lots of incentives and few opportunities for working families and families struggling to find work.
My work at Trybe has in part focused on finding economic and job training opportunities for neighborhood youth. Trybe has also focused on educational advancement to increase such opportunities. We work in partnership with other non-profits to provide our youth and young adults with economic opportunities. There are many locally based non-profit organizations dedicated to helping Oakland residents enter and re-enter the workforce and the City should partner with these organizations. I am committing to bringing city resources to
Answer from Abel J Guillen:
Answer from Andrew Park:
Answer from Abel J Guillen:
We cannot continue to accept that City revenues cannot support needed local services. I will work to grow Oakland's economy to increase City revenues. Oakland's sales tax revenue is much lower than similar size cities because our retail base is so small. We must attract more businesses to Oakland to increase our tax base so that we have the revenue needed to support local services, including public safety.
A. I would re-negotiate medical premiums with HMOs and explore other pooling options to save money. Peralta Colleges which is smaller than the City of Oakland currently pays a lower rate than the City for Single Coverage given similar benefit levels. It seems like we should be able to get better rates or at least minimize cost increases. The City should also consider looking at a entering into a JPA with neighboring cities to better negotiate benefits in a larger pool with CalPERS. Savings: $5 million
B. Deferred Capital Liabilities + Most of the projected budget shortfalls are due needed capital investments that have been differed. Once capital improvements have been made in one year, they do not have to be carried over into the next year. I would pursue looking at a General Obligation Bond Program to fund deferred capital needs with the caveat that the City must provide maintenance funds that would be funded out of the general fund. An assessment of $12 per $100,000 of assed value could generate over $80,000,000 to fund long term capital needs. This will go to fund sewers, streets, pavement and other pressing infrastructure issues that the City has neglected.
C. As we get these spikes in excessive Real Estate Transfer Taxes, I would set aside half of those funds to pay off pension liabilities. If it is not possible to make the payments and a refinancing is necessary, I would alone support such a move if we in fact made payments on an ongoing basis. It is expected that the last member of this system will expire in 2024. Answer from Andrew Park:
The pension obligations may be met with restructuring budget priorities and shared sacrifice when city leadership and community members have transparent access to where money comes from and goes to once in the city coffers, true understanding of the current budget process, and the willingness to work together in support of a long term vision of a better Oakland and getting there together.
What meeting Oakland's pensions obligations should not include is breaking past promises arrived at via lawful negotiation, cutting city staff and department resources until the city's functions are effectively hobbled, or kicking the can of this issue down the road with the use of unfair, immoral financial tools like SWAPS, over borrowing, and unhealthy debt to income longhorn bond solutions.
As a Public University Administrator, I've managed a multi million dollar budget and had to make the tough decisions that come with managing a budget in an era of waning resources- without kicking the problem down the road.
Answer from Abel J Guillen:
Answer from Andrew Park:
As co-chair of Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council 17, we have a well-recognized record of bringing residents together to work to make our neighborhood safer and encourage victims and friends/families of homicide victims to come forward and work to help solve crimes. Earning trust takes commitment, dedication and compassion. Neither the community nor the OPD can do it alone, we have to work together. From holding neighborhood meetings, to organizing Peace Walks, to hosting a Thank You OPD community picnic, I have worked with community members to address specific crime problems, to connect victims with the OPD and to encourage victims to come forward. This process works.
OPD has brought charges too many perpetrators of homicides in our community. As well, avoiding the negative fiscal byproduct of laying off police officers and achieving the number of officers required to restore beat walking officers is critical to ebbing the crime rate in Oakland and contributing to a flourishing, small business driven economy.
The order of the candidates is random and changes daily. Candidates who did not respond are not listed on this page. |