This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Alameda County, CA November 6, 2012 Election
Measure D
Changing Requirements for Sales or Disposals of City Parks
City of Alameda

Charter Amendment - Majority Approval Required

Pass: 23260 / 79.17% Yes votes ...... 6118 / 20.83% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Feb 1 2:01pm, 100.00% of Precincts Reporting (45/45)
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text

Shall the Charter of the City of Alameda be amended by amending Section 22-12 to eliminate language that allows the City Council to sell or dispose of public parks or any portion thereof if a new public park is designated, which means the sale or disposal of public parks must be approved by the electors?

Impartial Analysis from City Attorney
The City of Alameda has a voter-approved City Charter that requires voter approval for any sale or alienation of any public parks or portion of public parks within the City. There are three exceptions to this requirement, which authorize the City Council, without voter approval, to do any of the following: (1) lease or grant concessions or privileges in public parks; (2) grant permits, licenses or easements for street, utility or other purposes in public parks; or (3) sell or dispose of all or any portion of a public park as long as the City Council determines, after a public hearing or hearings, that the park will be replaced by another park of comparable size and utility which serves the same area with substantially the same amenities and improvements. Passage of this proposed initiative would eliminate the third exception. For purposes of this Charter section, the term "public parks" means any and all lands of the City which have been or will be designated by the City Council for public park purposes and/or recreational uses and opened to the public, including the Alameda Golf Complex. If this proposal becomes effective, the City Council will continue to be able, without voter approval, to lease park property for any length of time, or give rights to use park property for recreational activities and provision of utilities. The City Council would no longer be able to sell or dispose of park land, without voter approval, even when the park land would be replaced with comparable parkland elsewhere in the City.

/s/ Janet C. Kern City Attorney

  Events

Pros & Cons of Ballot Measures

  • Date: Thursday, October 11
    Time: 7:00 - 8:30 PM
    Place: Mastick Senior Center, 1155 Santa Clara Avenue
    Co-Sponsors: LWV Alameda and AAUW

  • The Pros & Cons of Ballot Measure D will be presented as part of a presentation of the Pros & Cons of the 1 Local, 2 County, and 11 State ballot measures..
    The presentation will be videotaped, and the video posted for viewing later.
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure D
Vote YES to help ensure that the sale or swap of any public parkland shall require approval of the voters. Twenty years ago, Alameda voters overwhelmingly approved a charter amendment banning the sale of City-owned parkland, including its municipal golf courses, without a vote of the people. However, the amendment contains an exception whereby parkland can be disposed of without voter approval. City Council may decide to exchange a park for another piece of land. This Measure will eliminate that exception. Recent events demonstrate why the loophole must be closed. Our Mif Albright par-3 golf course, where generations of young Alamedans learned the game, could have been exchanged by the City Council for property in a business park and cash. The developer intended to build 130 homes on our recreational land. Fortunately, Alamedans young and old raised overwhelming public opposition and stopped "The Swap." Yet, the resulting controversy distracted the work of city staff, Council, and citizens for years. And unless the loophole is closed + permanently + the battle may have to be fought again, perhaps in defense of another park. The distinguished sponsors of the original charter amendment emphasized its intent -- "to take out of the hands of politicians the ability to sell any of our precious public parks, golf courses and boating facilities and put any disposition of our parklands in the hands of you, the people." Any sale or exchange of parklands should require voter approval. Protect Alameda parks by voting YES on Measure D!

/s/ Tony Corica Alamedan

/s/ Marie Kane Business Woman

/s/ Mike Robles-Wong Community Advocate

/s/ Norma Arnerich Youth Sports Supporter

/s/ Nick Cabral Alamedan

(No arguments against Measure D were submitted)

Full Text of Measure D

Section 1. Title

This Initiative shall be known and referred to as the "Protect Our Alameda Parks Initiative."

Section 2. Findings 1. The City's public parks are a valuable community asset, contributing to the beauty, livability, health, fitness, and enjoyment of all of its citizens and residents.
2. The City's electors previously have expressed their strong support for the preservation of the City's public parks by overwhelmingly voting, in June of 1992, for Measure C, which prohibits the sale of the City's public parks without approval by the majority of the electors, except under certain listed exceptions.
3. The City Manager has proposed to the City Council selling a portion of the Alameda Golf Complex in exchange for land in the Harbor Bay Business Park without seeking a vote of the electors on such a proposal.
4. Neither the City Manager nor more than one member of the City Council has acknowledged the requirement of the electors to approve or disapprove such a proposal pursuant to Article XXII, Section 22-12 of the City Charter.
5. In order to protect the City's public parks from such proposals and litigation over the interpretation and enforcement of Article XXII, Section 22-12 of the City Charter, it is necessary to remove the "loophole" exception to the requirement that all sales of the City's public parks require the approval of the majority of the electors.

Section 3. Amendment Of Article XXII, Section 22-12 OF The City Charter Of The City Of Alameda

Article XXII, Section 22-12 of the City Charter of the City of Alameda is hereby amended as follows: Part (c) of the first sentence, and all of the second sentence, of Article XXII, Section 22-12 of the City Charter of the City of Alameda are hereby deleted in their entirety, such that Article XXII, Section 22-12 of the City Charter of the City of Alameda shall read as follows: "Sec. 22-12. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Charter to the contrary, the public parks of the City shall not be sold or otherwise alienated except pursuant to the affirmative votes of the majority of the electors voting on such a proposition; except that the City Council may (a) lease or grant concessions or privileges in public parks or any portion thereof or building or structure situated therein, or (b) grant permits, licenses or easements for street, utility or any other purposes in public parks or any portion thereof or building or structure situated thereinor c) sell or dispose of public parks or any portion thereof if, after a public hearing or hearings in each case, the City Council determines that another new public park has been or will be designated by the City Council for public park purposes and opened to the public for public park purposes. The City Council shall determine that said "new public park" is of comparable size and utility and serves the same service area with substantially the same amenities and improvements. As used herein "public parks" means any and all lands of the City which have been or will be designated by City Council for public park purposes and/or recreational uses and opened to the public for public park purposes and/or recreational uses. "Public parks" also includes the Alameda Golf Complex."

Section 4. Effective Date

This Charter Amendment shall become effective upon passage.

Section 5. Charter Amendment Language Supersedes Existing Charter Language This Charter Amendment language supersedes any existing Charter language to the extent that such existing Charter language it is in conflict with this Amendment.

Section 6. Severability

It is the intent of the People that the provisions of this Charter Amendment are severable and that if any section or provision of this Amendment or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect any other provision or application of this Charter Amendment which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

Section 7. Liberal Construction

The provisions of this Charter Amendment shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purposes.

Section 8. Conflicting Ballot Measures

In the event that this measure and another measure or measures relating to the City's public parks appear on the same city-wide election ballot, the provisions of the other measure or measures shall be deemed to be in conflict with this measure. In the event that this measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes than the other measure or measures, the provisions of this measure shall prevail over conflicting provisions in any other measure, and the conflicting provisions of the other measure or measures shall be null and void.


Alameda Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: February 1, 2013 14:01 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.