|
The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of Ohio and asked of all candidates for this office.
See below for questions on
Qualification,
Priorities,
Judicial independence,
Influence of campaign contribution,
Justice obstacle
Click on a name for candidate information. See also more information about this contest.
 |
1. What are your Qualifications for Office? (50 word limit)
|
Answer from Martha Good:
Since graduating #1 in my class from U.C. Law 25-years ago, I have been a U.S. Court of Appeals Mediator, Public Defender, Arbitrator, Judicial Law Clerk, Law School and Political Science Professor, making me uniquely qualified for the Ohio Court of Appeals.
Answer from Sylvia Sieve Hendon:
I have served on all levels of the court system in Hamilton County and bring nearly 27 years of judicial experience to the Appellate bench. Judicial restraint and thoughtful adherence to precedent are hallmarks of my decisions.
|
2. What plans do you have to address your top three priorities? (100 word limit)
|
Answer from Sylvia Sieve Hendon:
Timeliness of opinions is a top priority for me. I have strictly followed the Supreme Court guidelines for the release of cases and will continue to do so in order to effectively keep the docket current. Thoughtful research and clarity of the written decision are crucial in an appellate release because this Court's findings bind the lower courts in this jurisdiction.
Answer from Martha Good:
My academic background will ensure that my opinions will be based on the correct analysis of the law, without regard for ideology. Each case will be decided strictly on its merits. I will streamline the appellate process to make it more efficient, accessible and understandable. I will issue written opinions as promptly as possible, consistent with thorough deliberation. Finally, I will speak to school and community groups about the role of courts in a democracy so that they citizens can better understand the importance of the judiciary in keeping our constitutional system alive and well.
|
3. How do you define "judicial independence," and how important is it to our judicial system? What measures ensure an independent judiciary? (150 word limit)
|
Answer from Martha Good:
Judicial independence means deciding each case strictly on its own merits and in accordance with the law. It means all decisions must be consistent with the US and Ohio Constitutions and laws rather than being decided on the basis of any predetermined political agenda or personal beliefs. Such independence is necessary to ensure that the Courts and their decisions are considered legitimate. It is one of the most important bedrocks of our democracy because it ensures that disputes will be resolved in a manner that is fair and impartial, and that the citizens respect and comply with the court's rulings.
Answer from Sylvia Sieve Hendon:
Judicial independence is critical to the public's perception of justice. It is important that no matter what the result, the litigants know that their case has been fully and carefully heard. A judge must avoid even the appearance of impropriety and recuse him/herself when conflicts arise.
|
4. Would you recuse yourself if a party before you had made a significant judicial campaign expenditure toward your election? Please explain. (150 words)
|
Answer from Sylvia Sieve Hendon:
It is axiomatic that a recusal would be appropriate if a significant campaign contribution is received. The question introduces the broader issue of campaign financing in general in judicial races. The Supreme Court has set limits on contributions that vary with the office sought, but the possibility for campaign influence still exists. I would welcome revisions of the current rules, as well as a retention form of election for the higher courts of Ohio.
Answer from Martha Good:
Yes. I would recuse myself anytime that a party before me made any significant campaign expenditure toward my election.
|
5. What do you perceive to be the greatest obstacle to justice in Ohio? (150 words)
|
Answer from Martha Good:
When I began law school in 1981 one month before the birth of my first son, I did not envision becoming a judge. But I was deeply committed to the protection everyone's constitutional rights and ensuring equal justice for all. One of the reasons I wanted to be a lawyer was in order to make a difference in the lives of ordinary people. As one of the first Human Rights Fellows at University of Cincinnati College of Law, I had the opportunity to meet distinguished visitors and learn about human rights issues throughout the world. But it was not until I worked as a public defender years later that I realized the extent of the serious flaws in our own justice system and its administration. I came to realize that the front line in the battle to achieve international human rights is right here in Hamilton County.
Answer from Sylvia Sieve Hendon:
The only obstacle to "justice" in Ohio might be the heavy caseloads carried by most courts. A luxury in the Appellate court is time - something not shared by the trial court bench. The judiciary in Hamilton County is known statewide for its innovative procedures and for its reputation for integrity. Access to court is guaranteed for all citizens in the First District Court of Appeals, and pro se litigants are treated with the same respect and adherence to the Rules of Procedure that govern the practicing bar.
Responses to questions asked of each candidate
are reproduced as submitted to the League.
Candidates' statements are presented as submitted. Word limits apply for each question. Direct references to opponents are not permitted.
The order of the candidates is random and changes daily. Candidates who did not respond are not listed on this page.
| 
League of Women Voters of Ohio Education Fund
