This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sac/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure J Utility User Tax City of Elk Grove Majority Approval Required Pass: 31,093 / 76.57% Yes votes ...... 9,514 / 23.43% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Results as of Jan 3 10:57am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (105/105) |
Information shown below: Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | |||||
Shall an ordinance be adopted to reduce the existing Utility User Tax from 2.5% to 2.25%; modernize the current ordinance to treat taxpayers equally regardless of technology used for telecommunications and video services; to preserve funding for essential general municipal services, such as public safety?
Background. Upon incorporation, the City of Elk Grove adopted a Utility Users Tax ("UUT") identical to that used in the County of Sacramento. The County's UUT ordinance had been in effect for many years prior to the City's adoption of its text; the City has not altered any of the ordinance authorizing the UUT in the intervening 10 years. Because of recent changes in federal laws, some cellular telephone companies are challenging ordinances similar to Elk Grove's in court. The cellular telephone companies claim that these federal changes should, in effect, remove the local UUT on most telephone calls. In specific, telecommunication companies are contesting the ability to tax call processing in the era of bundled services. Also, new technologies for telephone and video services are evolving. These technologies didn't exist at the time the UUT was adopted and therefore were not included in the existing ordinance. As users move to the new technology, UUT revenue from telecommunications and video services will decline. Users who cannot, or do not choose to, use the new technology will be taxed while others receiving the same service through newer technology will not. Effect. In substance, Measure J would do the following:
A "NO" vote is a vote to reject the new UUT ordinance and keep the existing UUT. FISCAL IMPACT The legal and technology issues could reduce the City's projected General Fund revenues by as much as $600,000 per year. The General Fund pays for most of the City's police, code enforcement, animal control, financial and administrative services, and some transit services. Some or all of these services could be affected by the lost revenue. Measure J would prevent the loss of those revenues.
Respectfully submitted,
|
|
Arguments For Measure J | Arguments Against Measure J |
NO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST
MEASURE J WAS FILED
| NO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST
MEASURE J WAS FILED
|