This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/la/ for current information. |
Los Angeles County, CA | November 2, 2010 Election |
Follow the Money to District HeadquartersBy Chris BleyCandidate for Member, Board of Education; Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
Zero-based budgeting for non-classroom expenditures, combined with comparing SMMUSD's costs with similar districts could identify budget cuts that would not impact the classroom.Follow the Money to 1651 16th Street By Chris Bley To discover any person or group's true priorities, just watch where the money goes. Sadly, the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School Board continues to define itself by a poorly developed budget that places the highest priority on preserving the status quo at SMMUSD's 16th Street headquarters. Reduced state and federal funding means that cuts have to be made somewhere. In our district the classroom--the heart of education--is starting to suffer. The root of the problem lies in SMMUSD's automatic, mechanical budgeting system. Administrators and the school board simply base budgeting decisions on the previous year's funding level in each category. That method assumes the previous year's funding level is still justified, regardless of any financial or operational changes that may have occurred during the year, or over-budgeting that may have occurred in prior years. The result: departments receiving excessive funding continue receiving it, year after year. Zero-based budgeting requires financial decision makers to justify expenditures each fiscal year, for all or selected categories. If SMMUSD used zero-based budgeting on non-classroom budget categories, excesses would be found, and the funds could be diverted back to the classroom. How can I make this claim? After a few weeks studying the SMMUSD budget and budgets of comparable districts, I have already found excesses. For the current fiscal year, even after suffering a 4.8% drop in revenues, SMMUSD has allocated the same funding as previous years for a number of non-classroom-related areas:
Why is the board retaining personnel recruiters and spending almost 1% of the total budget on data processing--especially while class sizes are increased, our internationally renowned music program is whittled down, and many other student-serving personnel are laid off? Zero-based budgeting makes sure this type of question is raised. Questions must be asked and answered during a public process, so the community can make sure that district leaders shift their budget priorities from district headquarters to the classroom. To keep our schools strong, the school board can't just pay lip service to a classroom focus. The board must put our money where their mouth is. Note: Federal funding and donations solicited by parents restored some of the cuts made for this year, but that was a one-time bail-out. Next year the situation will be the same, or worse. |
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
November 2010 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter