This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/cc/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure W 2030 General Plan City of San Ramon Majority Approval Required Fail: 5946 / 28.63% Yes votes ...... 14826 / 71.37% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Results as of Nov 30 11:25am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (32/32) |
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | ||||
To plan for the future, shall an ordinance be adopted to: approve General Plan 2030; extend Ordinance 197 policies and procedures to 2015 to protect ridgelines, creeks, and open space; expand the Ridgeline Creek Protection Zone map; and extend the Urban Growth Boundary to enhance local control while preserving our quality of life?
1) GENERAL PLAN 2030 State law requires cities to adopt comprehensive long-term general plans for the development of the city. The General Plan must include at least seven mandatory elements (land use, circulation, housing, conservation, open space, noise, and safety). It must also include a comprehensive, long-term plan for the physical development of both the city and any land outside the city's boundaries that the city determines relates to its planning. The City's existing General Plan 2020 includes an Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), and a requirement for voter review of the UGB in 2010. The proposed General Plan 2030 would:
In 1999 the voters adopted Measure G. This measure, Measure W, would continue existing Measure G requirements that before any general plan amendment can take effect, the Planning Commission and the City Council must each hold at least three public hearings on any proposed amendment; only if the Planning Commission recommended the amendment by a 4/5th vote and only if the City Council approves it by a 4/5th vote. This Measure would also continue to require voter approval for any General Plan amendment, Specific Plan, or other development that is inconsistent with Ordinance 197 policies. A "yes" vote is a vote to adopt the changes described above. A "no" vote rejects the changes described above.
Sheryl Schaffner, City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure W which adopts General Plan 2030. The Ordinance portion of Measure W directly follows the arguments and is presented at the end of this Pamphlet. If you desire a copy of the full text of the Measure W General Plan 2030 documents, you may: review those at the City Clerk's office, 2222 Camino Ramon, San Ramon; on the City's website at www.sanramon.ca.gov; or call the City Clerk at 925.973.2539 to have them sent to you at no cost.
|
Debates Supporters and Opponents
|
Arguments For Measure W | Arguments Against Measure W |
In March 2002, voters overwhelmingly approved San Ramon resident-drafted General Plan 2020. General Plan 2030 is a state-mandated update of General Plan 2020 to guide City planning for the next twenty years. Along with the Tri-Valley's only state-certified Housing Element, General Plan 2030 embraces numerous strategies enhancing San Ramon's quality of life:
Both Danville and the County want to plan Tassajara Valley. While most County voters live far from Tassajara Valley and are not affected by planning decisions regarding it, Tassajara Valley is San Ramon's backyard. Vote for local planning control and YES on Measure W to approve General Plan 2030. H. Abram Wilson, San Ramon - Mayor Donna Kerger, San Ramon Planning Commissioner Eric G. Wallis, San Ramon Planning Commissioner Carol A. Lopez, San Ramon Parks & Community Service Commissioner Dennis Viers, San Ramon Planning Commissioner
| Measure W is a deceptive plan by San Ramon politicians and out-of-town developers. Disguised as a "General Plan Amendment" to protect ridgelines and open space, Measure W breaks our Urban Growth Boundary (approved by San Ramon voters in 2006). If approved, Measure W will allow development of 1,624 additional acres in Tassajara Valley and add 608 acres in the hills west of 680.
We're San Ramon residents who care about our quality of life. We support protecting San Ramon's ridgelines and open space + we oppose Measure W. So do Save Mount Diablo, Sierra Club and Greenbelt Alliance. If Measure W passes, developers will be given the green light on the first major step in building up to 4,200 houses in Tassajara Valley. After that they won't need another ballot vote. The politicians won't tell us what they plan, but these same land speculators proposed thousands of houses in Tassajara in the 1990s. There are 4,600 units, unbuilt but already approved, in San Ramon and Dougherty Valley, exceeding San Ramon's needs. The consequences will be devastating. Thousands more houses will lower property values and overcrowd schools, diverting students westward, negatively impacting the quality of education. Our water supply would be stretched in drought years, and more expensive. Up to 20,000 new residents will significantly strain police and fire protection services. Thousands more cars will jam our already congested roads and freeways. In economically uncertain times, Measure W is not a risk we can afford to take. The only ones who benefit: Out-of-town developers, who will make millions of dollars; politicians who receive campaign donations from the developers. Don't be fooled by a big developer-funded campaign promoting "local control" and "ridgeline protection." Expanding the voter-approved Urban Growth Boundary will pave the way for building thousands of houses. We're San Ramon Residents Opposed to Measure W. Please join us in voting NO. Contact us: http://tinyurl.com/NoOnMeasureW Phil O'Loane, Planning Commission Chair(2009-2010), San Ramon Resident Sarah (Sally) Scholl, Retired Teacher, Contra Costa County "Teacher of the Year" (2000), San Ramon Resident San Ramon Residents, Opposed to Measure W, Doug Burr, Co-Chair Aron Draggoo, Police Officer, San Ramon Resident Elisa Dowd, Veterinarian and Small Business Owner, San Ramon Resident
|