This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sf/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
San Francisco County, CA June 8, 2010 Election
Proposition B
Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response Bond
San Francisco County

Bond - 2/3 Approval Required

Pass: 117553 / 79.41% Yes votes ...... 30484 / 20.59% No votes

See Also: Index of all Propositions

Information shown below: Fiscal Impact | Yes/No Meaning | Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

SAN FRANCISCO EARTHQUAKE SAFETY AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE BOND, 2010. To improve fire, earthquake and emergency response and ensure firefighters a reliable water supply for fires and disasters, through projects including: improving deteriorating pipes, hydrants, reservoirs, water cisterns and pumps built after the 1906 earthquake; improving neighborhood fire stations; replacing the seismically-unsafe emergency command center with an earthquake-safe building; and to pay related costs, shall the City and County of San Francisco issue $412,300,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to citizen oversight and regular audits?

Fiscal Impact from The City Controller:
City Controller Ben Rosenfield has issued the following statement on the fiscal impact of Proposition B: Should the proposed $412.3 million in bonds be authorized and sold under current assumptions, the approximate costs will be as follows:

  • In fiscal year 2010-2011, following issuance of the first series of bonds, and the year with the lowest tax rate, the estimated annual costs of debt service would be $3.6 million and result in a property tax rate of $0.0026 per $100 ($2.60 per $100,000) of assessed valuation.

  • In fiscal year 2016-2017, following issuance of the last series of bonds, and the year with the highest tax rate, the estimated annual costs of debt service would be $32.66 million and result in a property tax rate of $0.018 per $100 ($18.00 per $100,000) of assessed valuation.

  • The best estimate of the average tax rate for these bonds from fiscal year 2010-2011 through 2039-2040 is $0.0106 per $100 ($10.60 per $100,000) of assessed valuation.

  • Based on these estimates, the highest estimated annual property tax cost for the owner of a home with an assessed value of $400,000 would be approximately $70.74.

  • Landlords would be allowed to pass through 50% of the annual property tax cost of the proposed bond to tenants as permitted in the City Administrative Code. Based on these estimates, the highest estimated annual cost for a tenant in a unit with an assessed value of approximately $131,000 would be $11.79.

These estimates are based on projections only, which are not binding upon the City. Projections and estimates may vary due to the timing of bond sales, the amount of bonds sold at each sale, and actual assessed valuation over the term of repayment of the bonds. Hence, the actual tax rate and the years in which such rates are applicable may vary from those estimated above. The City's current debt management policy is to issue new general obligation bonds only as old ones are retired, keeping the property tax impact from general obligation bonds approximately the same over time.

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote on this measure means:
If you vote "yes," you want the City to issue up to $412,300,000 in general obligation bonds, subject to independent oversight and regular audits, for construction, renovation, and seismic retrofitting of fire and police department buildings and infrastructure. Landlords would be allowed to pass 50% of the increase in property taxes to tenants.

A NO vote on this measure means:
If you vote "no," you do not want the City to issue these general obligation bonds for construction, renovation, and seismic retrofitting of fire and police department buildings and infrastructure.

Impartial Analysis from San Francisco Ballot Simplification Committee
The Way It Is Now: In the event of an earthquake or major disaster, the City relies on its fire and police departments to provide emergency response. These departments depend on facilities and infrastructure, which include:

  • The Citywide Auxiliary Water Supply System (AWSS), which provides a dedicated high pressure water system for fighting fires. It includes a reservoir, pipes, cisterns, pump stations and high-pressure fire hydrants. This system was built in response to the 1906 earthquake;

  • Neighborhood fire stations;

  • Neighborhood police stations; and

  • The Police Command Center.

Both the Southern District Police Station and the Police Command Center are housed in the Hall of Justice at 850 Bryant St. Studies commissioned by the City indicate that the AWSS, several fire stations and the Hall of Justice are deteriorating and probably could not be used after a major earthquake.

The City's 10-year Capital Plan identifies the repairs and relocation of public safety facilities and infrastructure as a high priority.

With the approval of the voters, the City may issue general obligation bonds to pay for capital projects such as building or renovating fire and police stations and the AWSS. Property tax revenues pay for the principal and interest on general obligation bonds.

The Proposal: Proposition B is a bond measure that would authorize the City to borrow up to $412,300,000 by issuing general obligation bonds for capital projects to improve the City's fire, earthquake and emergency response.

Specific projects could include:

  • Upgrades to the City's Auxiliary Water Supply System (AWSS), including renovations and seismic retrofitting.

  • Construction, renovation and seismic retrofitting of fire stations.

  • Construction of a new Public Safety Building in Mission Bay. This building would house the Police Command Center, the Southern District Police Station, and a neighborhood fire station.

The Mayor and the Board of Supervisors would approve the final list of projects.

Proposition B would require the Citizen's General Obligation Bond Oversight Committee to provide independent oversight of the spending of bond funds. One-tenth of one percent (0.1%) of these funds would pay for the Committee's audit and oversight.

Proposition B would allow an increase in the property tax to pay for the bonds. It would permit landlords to pass 50% of the resulting property tax increase to tenants.

Two-thirds of the voters would have to approve this measure for it to pass.

  News and Analysis

Google News Search

General Links

City and County of San Francisco
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Proposition B Arguments Against Proposition B
YES ON B + EARTHQUAKE AND FIRE SAFETY FOR SAN FRANCISCO Proposition B rebuilds and restores our aging emergency fire-fighting water system and prepares San Francisco for a major disaster.

After the great 1906 quake, San Francisco burned for 96 hours -- the sixth time our city had burned to the ground. To prevent San Francisco from burning down again, citizens constructed the world's best emergency fire system.

Today, the 100 year-old system's reservoirs, pump stations, cisterns and pipes are deteriorating. This led to major failures during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake.

Equally troubling, our police command center + vital for disaster response and coordination + is housed in a seismically unsafe building that will be unusable after a major earthquake.

Proposition B:

  • Ensures a steady supply of high-pressure water following an earthquake, giving firefighters the tools to fight major fires;

  • Replaces deteriorating pipes, reservoirs and pump stations, and builds new cisterns throughout the city;

  • Improves seismically deficient and unsafe neighborhood fire stations;

  • Constructs a new public safety building for emergency command operations that can withstand a major earthquake.

Proposition B has been carefully drafted so that, in these tough economic times, it will NOT increase property tax rates. There will be independent citizen oversight of spending and regular financial audits. Specific legal requirements encourage the use of local construction businesses, which could provide up to 2,900 jobs for San Franciscans during the worst recession in decades.

Earthquake scientists say the odds are two in three that a disastrous earthquake will strike San Francisco before 2040. That's why your support is critical. Please help us improve earthquake and fire safety by voting YES on B.

Mayor Gavin Newsom Board of Supervisors President David Chiu Police Chief George Gascón* Fire Chief Joanne Hayes-White* Fire Commissioner Victor Makras* San Francisco Firefighters Union Local 798 Vice- President Joe Moriarty

  • For identification purposes only; author

Rebuttal to Arguments For
Vote No on Proposition B!

San Franciscans know that there's a good chance that a disastrous earthquake will strike here in the next few decades. So why are the proponents of Prop B sounding the alarm to sink addition monies into fire houses and a new "public safety building," while leaving our jails and courts to fend for themselves in the seismically unsafe 850 Bryant?

The answer is politics.

The proponents of Prop B don't think that San Francisco voters are willing to fund the construction of a new jail, and they don't want to touch the controversial topic of our City's outdated and mismanaged crime lab. Meanwhile, behind closed doors, the politicians are charting a political strategy with the top bosses from the firefighter union to move forward their political agenda.

Unfortunately, their agenda means that there will be political losers. And it won't just be the people that we have locked up fighting for their lives in a major earthquake.

It will also be the Deputy Sheriffs, District Attorneys, Judges and jurors, and members of the public who are unlucky enough to be there when the next big one hits.

Presented with the facts and the complete picture, San Francisco voters would opt to do the right thing and make sure that every component of our public safety system was safe.

Don't let the politicians sell you short. Send this one back for a rewrite. Vote No on Prop B!

Chris Daly

Make sure that everyone at the Hall of Justice is safe. Vote No on B!

The proponents of Proposition B say they are concerned about seismic safety issues in our public safety system + especially at the Hall of Justice. The City knows that a major earthquake could turn 850 Bryant into a deathtrap. But Prop B doesn't fix this problem. Instead, it would only move police functions out of the Hall of Justice + leaving the Courts and jails, and over 1000 people there, at risk.

The proponents of Prop B claim that they have a plan to rebuild the rest of the Hall of Justice. Their idea is to issue debt to pay for the rebuild, asking the next generation of San Franciscans to pay for it. But that plan is not included in this measure, and they have known about the seismic problems there since 1992. The truth is that there is no live plan to rebuild the Hall, and the best opportunity to fix the whole problem, this measure, has willfully omitted the complete fix to accommodate "political realities."

These "political realities" include a belief that San Franciscans don't want to spend money to build jails. As one of the leading advocates for community-based alternatives for non-violent offenders, nothing would please me more than to be able to close jails and help people reenter society. But the real-life realities are that over 750, mostly black and Latino, lower-level offenders are locked up on the top floors of 850 Bryant. In the event of a major earthquake, they are the most at-risk. In San Francisco, I'd like to think that we'd do better.

Vote No on B.

Supervisor Chris Daly

Rebuttal to Arguments Against
PROTECT ALL SAN FRANCISCANS FROM EARTHQUAKE AND FIRE. VOTE YES ON B.

Proposition B isn't about the safety of 1,000 people + it's about ensuring that EVERYONE who lives, works and visits San Francisco is safe in the event of a major earthquake.

That's why Proposition B is supported by our fire, public safety and emergency response leaders, including the San Francisco Firefighters, Fire Chief, Fire Commissioners, Police Chief and Police Commissioners.

Because Proposition B protects residents throughout the city, it is also supported by the broadest San Francisco coalition: the Democratic and Republican Parties; the Labor Council and the Chamber of Commerce; the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors.

Proposition B is critical to San Francisco because it strengthens our 100 year-old emergency water supply system, ensuring that firefighters have the high-pressure water supply they need to put out a major fire, even after an earthquake.

Prop B also moves the seismically unsafe police command headquarters to a new public safety building, ensuring that emergency response and public safety are maintained after a major disaster.

Supervisor Daly would have us put off these safety measures until there is a proposition more to his liking. The fact is, we cannot do everything at once, and we cannot afford to wait. Please join us in protecting San Francisco and vote YES on B.

Mayor Gavin Newsom Board of Supervisors President David Chiu Supervisor Carmen Chu Police Chief George Gascón* Fire Chief Joanne Hayes-White* Fire Commissioner Victor Makras* San Francisco Firefighters Union Local 798 Vice- President Joe Moriarty

  • For identification purposes only; author is signing as an individual and not on behalf of an organization.


San Francisco Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: August 20, 2010 21:43 PDT
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.