This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sm/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure A Parcel Tax San Mateo Foster City School District 2/3 Approval Required Pass: 14,689 / 67.0% Yes votes ...... 7,238 / 33.0% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Information shown below: Arguments | Full Text | |||
To protect local schools from damaging State budget cuts, provide stable local funding that cannot be taken away by the State, and preserve quality education by attracting and retaining qualified teachers and staff, maintaining school libraries, providing middle school art and music programs and supporting small class sizes, shall San Mateo-Foster City School District increase the expiring school parcel tax by $96 for seven years, with annual cost of living adjustments, exemptions for seniors and independent fiscal oversight?
|
|
Arguments For Measure A | Arguments Against Measure A |
We need Measure A to maintain the quality of our local public schools. San Mateo-Foster City schools benefit from our voter approved parcel tax that is scheduled to expire in June 2010. Measure A will extend this local funding for our schools for an additional seven years.
Without passage of Measure A, our schools will lose approximately $6 million a year, on top of the over $18 million in State cuts since 2007. Cuts of this magnitude will devastate our elementary and middle schools. To prevent significant cuts to core academic programs, Measure A has been placed on the February 2010 ballot. The existing tax will be increased by a modest $8 a month more than taxpayers currently pay. Passage of Measure A will help prevent the most devastating cuts to core academic programs and will provide stable local funding that cannot be taken away by the State. Independent fiscal oversight and audits are required and seniors are eligible for an exemption. Measure A will help:
Great schools benefit everyone in our community. We need reliable local revenue to shield our students and schools from the harmful effects of the ongoing State cuts.
/s/ Carole Groom, San Mateo County Supervisor /s/ Melodie L. Lew, Commissioner, San Mateo Service Commission /s/ William Chow, Realtor /s/ Ruth K. Nagler, Community Events Coordinator /s/ Phyllis Harris, President, San Mateo Elementary Teachers' Association
| Government's appetite for higher taxes and still higher spending never ends.
Consider all the taxes we pay, most of them at record highs:
Record revenue engendered bloated payrolls and unsustainable benefit schemes; outstripping our ability to pay for them. No amount of revenue can prevent politicians from spending more money than they take in. The state government's school districts are out of control: consuming almost half of the state budget and borrowing recklessly to spend even more. And, on top of all that, they have the gall to ask for higher parcel taxes, too? We couldn't stop Sacramento from raising sales and income taxes last year - but we can finally put an end to one long-standing "temporary" parcel tax. Now is our opportunity. Please vote No. This superfluous surtax is just plain greedy. /s/ Harland Harrison, Chair, Libertarian Party of San Mateo County /s/ John J. Jack Hickey
|
Full Text of Measure A |
By approval of this proposition by at least two-thirds (2/3) of the registered voters voting on the proposition, the District will be authorized to levy a qualified special tax of $180.85 per parcel (adjusted annually by the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Metropolitan Area Consumer Price Index) for seven (7) years on each nonexempt parcel of land in the District. Parcels which are owned and occupied as the primary residence by at least one person age 65 or older will qualify for an exemption from the tax upon filing of an annual application for such exemption.
|