This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sm/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure F Transit Occupancy Tax City of San Bruno Majority Approval Required Pass: 3,093 / 69.8% Yes votes ...... 1,336 / 30.2% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Results as of Dec 29 12:09pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (26/26) 27.8% Voter Turnout (77,340/277,759) |
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text | ||||
To preserve funding for general city services, shall the City of San Bruno approve an ordinance amending the San Bruno Municipal Code to increase the transient occupancy tax rate from ten (10%) to twelve (12%) per cent on the rate charged to hotel guests within the City?
The City's Transient Occupancy Tax rate is currently 10%. The City Council last increased the Transient Occupancy Tax from 8% to 10% in 1991, and the voters affirmed the rate in 2001. State law authorizes the City of San Bruno to levy this tax if approved both by two-thirds of the City Council and by a majority of the voters voting in this election on the proposal. The San Bruno City Council unanimously approved the proposed tax increase to 12% on July 14, 2009. Several neighboring cities are placing similar measures on the November 3, 2009 ballot to increase their Transient Occupancy Tax rates from 10% to 12%. The Transient Occupancy Tax is a general tax and as such requires a majority vote and is imposed for general governmental purposes. All proceeds from the tax would be deposited in the City's general fund and could be used for any general municipal purposes, such as police and fire protection, library services, public works, parks and recreation, and other governmental functions and services. The City's revenue in 2008-09 from the Transient Occupancy Tax was $1,225,000. If hotel usage and rents remained similar in the future, the 2% increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax would generate approximately $270,000 in additional general fund revenue in future years. The actual amount collected would depend on hotel usage and room rates. Planned general fund expenditures were reduced for the 2009-10 fiscal year by $2,500,000 to offset a projected reduction in revenues of the same amount. If Measure F is approved by a majority of the voters at the November 3, 2009, election, the 2% increase would be imposed starting on January 1, 2010. A YES Vote approves the measure. A NO vote rejects the measure.
|
|
Arguments For Measure F | Arguments Against Measure F |
Measure F is not a new tax and will not raise taxes for homeowners or renters in San Bruno. As costs for City operations have risen, the hotel tax has remained at 10% since 1991. Throughout the U.S., hotel taxes are routinely paid by travelers - in over 85% of the cities in California, including 15 cities in San Mateo County.
Nearly 60 cities in California currently have hotel tax rates over 10% and voters in our neighboring cities of Millbrae, Burlingame, and San Mateo are also considering increases to 12% at this same time. The small increase of 2% will raise an estimated $270,000 in much needed new revenue. San Bruno has reduced services and has cut the number of employees to balance the budget and address continuing decline in City revenues. Going forward, our choices are clear - find additional revenue or face further deep cuts in essential services. Measure F applies only to travelers staying at hotels or motels in our city - the hotel tax continues to have no impact on San Bruno homeowners or renters. These tax revenues make communities more attractive to travelers by helping to maintain city services. Travelers using our city will now pay a fair share to cover some of the expense of City operations. Visitors using our hotels and motels in San Bruno rely on our police and fire public safety services as well as our street and streelight maintenance. Voting YES ON MEASURE F means these visitors will continue to pay a fair share of the costs for these services. Please join your City Council in voting YES on Measure F /s/ Larry Franzella, Mayor /s/ Jim Ruane, Vice Mayor /s/ Ken Ibarra, Councilmember /s/ Rico E. Medina, Councilmember /s/ Irene O'Connell, Councilmember
| None submitted at this time
|
Full Text of Measure F |
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BRUNO AMENDING SECTION 3.32.010 OF THE SAN BRUNO MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCREASE THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX ON RENT CHARGED TO HOTEL GUESTS FROM TEN (10%) TO TWELVE PERCENT (12%).
The City Council of San Bruno ordains as follows: Section 1. The first sentence of Section 3.32.010, entitled "Tax imposed - Amount-Debt to city" is hereby amended so that it reads as follows: "for the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of twelve percent of the rent charged by the operator." Section 2. Approval General Municipal Election; Effective Date. This ordinance amending Section 3.32.010 of Chapter 3.32 of the San Bruno Municipal Code shall be in full force and effect ten (10) days after the date on which the City Council has approved the canvass of votes and declared that the voters of the City of San Bruno have approved said ordinance by a vote of no less than a majority of the votes cast by the electors voting on the tax measure set forth in this ordinance at the general municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2009. The effective date for purposes of levying the increased tax shall be January 1, 2010. Section 3. The City Clerk shall publish this Ordinance according to the law. |