This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/alm/ for current information. |
| |||||
| |||||
Candidates Answer Questions on the Issues Board Member; East Bay Municipal Utility District; Ward 5 | |||||
|
The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of the Bay Area and asked of all candidates for this office.
See below for questions on
Water
Click on a name for candidate information. See also more information about this contest.
Answer from Susi Ostlund:
Of all the allocation methods proposed, basing it on your past billing data (which we actually have legal access to) is a compromise, and the allocation adjustment process does allow for exceptions for people who do believe it unfair. If you don't like your allocation amount someone can make contact with you to make a more customized allocation allotment for your household --at great expense to EBMUD, unfortunately. There are estimates that we'll see over 70,000 allocation adjustment requests filed before June. That's going to cost a lot of money, assuming our staff can even keep up with that kind of work load.
The fact is we do need to conserve water, and yes, it will be an inconvenience for everyone until the drought is over no matter what allocation system we use. Overall households are doing a great job of meeting this goal. From what I'm hearing, only 20% of all households are facing any kind of extra charge, and the average overage for a 60 day billing period is $10 +or $5 a month.
I've talked with people inside EBMUD, outside EBMUD, and all around my district. Basing drought allocations on past water consumption is the fairest method we've got so far. I'm not happy with it and I'd love to have a better process. But it's what we have legal access to without becoming Big Brother peering into people's homes and being very invasive of their privacy.
The order of the candidates is random and changes daily. Candidates who did not respond are not listed on this page. |