Judicial Elections, Part 1

By Jesús "Jess" Valencia

The Importance of An Independent and Unbiased Judge.

Judicial candidates don't have the luxury or freedom of answering questions intended for politicians. As a judicial candidate, and a member of the judicial branch, I am precluded by judicial canons and rules of ethics from publicly taking or stating a position on a case or matter of public policy or controversy which is pending (or could potentially come) before the court.

Many of the voters I have come across have raised important and intelligent questions involving their rights and interests, (including the fundamental right to vote, privacy, speech, religion), the public's right to maintain secure borders, the integrity of elections, public safety, gun control, etc. As a judicial officer I am duty bound by my oath of office to follow the rule of law and to support and defend the federal and state constitutions. I am also obligated to maintain the integrity and independence of the court. While I have a constitutional right to express my personal views and opinions on many matters, I must take great care that doing so does not undermine my obligation to remain neutral and independent. A good judge must avoid undermining the trust, integrity and independence of the court. Even the appearance of bias must be avoided.

Thus, when I am asked a question about a subject that may compromise the independence, objectivity and integrity of the court, I give a brief explanation and respectfully decline expressing my opinion on the matters. I mean no disrespect. Nor am I trying to be coy or evasive. I'm simply following the judicial canons of ethics to the best of my ability. I have found that most people understand and appreciate this important limitation.