The questions were prepared by the Leagues of Women Voters of Santa Clara County and asked of all candidates for this office.     See below for questions on Experience, Changes, Budget

Click on a name for candidate information.   See also more information about this contest.

Answer from Dolores A. Carr:

I have served our community in the legal and judicial system for 25 years - including almost 6 years as a Superior Court Judge, 15 as a Deputy District Attorney, and almost 5 years in private practice. The District Attorney does not work alone, but is instead part of a large and complicated criminal justice system. My experience in county government, the judicial branch, and private law practice makes me uniquely qualified to serve our community in that role.

As part of my career in the DA's Office, I supervised the Sexual Assault Unit, a critical position for protecting our community. As part of my work, I charged virtually all of the sex crimes in the county. I was the first Deputy DA in California to specialize in prosecuting sex offenders who fail to register their residence with local authorities.

From 1991 - 2004, I was an appointed member of the Board of Reappraisers for the Committee of Bar Examiners for the State Bar of California, one of only 9 members in the state. The State Bar is in charge of all lawyers who want to practice in California. I also served as a consultant for 15 years for the National Conference of Bar Examiners, conducting workshops for bar examiners throughout the United States.

From 1994 - 1999, I was elected as the President of the Government Attorneys Association, which represents local deputy district attorneys and public defenders in labor negotiations and employment matters. This leadership experience gave me the opportunity to build relationships with county officials and other employee organizations. In addition, I learned from the employee's perspective how important it is for management to be consistent in the application of policies, and to create an environment where people are both enthusiastic about their work and encouraged to find ways to do their work more efficiently.

I was elected to Superior Court in March 2000, winning 71% of the vote. Since being elected judge in 2000, I have presided over countless criminal, family law and civil cases.

After handling criminal cases for seven months, I volunteered to be assigned to the Family Division, one of the most difficult jobs on the court; the Division deals with what I believe to be a core value of our society - how we treat our children. I made final decisions in the most important areas of our lives (is there any decision tougher than deciding the custody of a child?). The District Attorney must be accountable for the toughest decisions; I consider my experience as the final arbiter in thousands of cases to be an important qualification for the post.

The following year, I was appointed the Supervising Judge of the Family Division. In addition to handling a full-time caseload, I managed a division of over 20 people. I was responsible for managing Family Court at Park Center Plaza as well as the Notre Dame Courthouse, which hears Child Support Agency cases. In addition to supervising the judicial officers, I oversaw Family Court Services, the Self-Service Center, the Facilitator's Office, the Settlement Officer program, the courtroom clerks, the court reporters, and the Clerk's Office. This management experience outside the DA's Office provides me with a broad perspective I will use in evaluating and improving management practices within the DA's Office.

In addition to handling a full time caseload, I worked diligently to provide better access to justice for all people coming to Family Court. I am most proud of my work on behalf of people who must navigate a complex family court system without adequate resources. Approximately 85% of people with cases in family court do not have attorneys, and many do not speak English. As Supervising Judge of the Family Division from 2002-2005, I led efforts to assist them in getting their cases before the court more easily -- especially minorities and non-English speaking people. We created a program of ongoing training for court staff, including interpreters, on cultural awareness, immigration and trafficking, issues which arise in arranged marriages, and services available in the community to help litigants.

Under my leadership, we hired a number of multi-lingual professionals and staff from diverse backgrounds to better serve our diverse population. I am very proud of these achievements.

In January 2005, I was assigned to develop our county's first Unified Family Court, which seeks to coordinate families' cases before one judge (typically family, probate guardianship, juvenile delinquency or dependency, and criminal domestic violence cases). This reduces the number of courts in which the parties must appear, and allows the judge to approach the family's issues more comprehensively because the judge as more complete information. I also served on a number of Court committees dealing with critical issues, including Budget/Finance, Supervising Judges, Rules, Internal Policies, Legislation, and Proposition 63/Mental Health Services Act. Again, this broad experience will prove invaluable in working with other stakeholders in the criminal justice system and in improving operations within the District Attorney's Office.

Through these many years of experiences inside and outside the DA's Office, I have gained a balanced perspective on the role and character of the Office. The DA must be ethical, operate with integrity, build and maintain effective coalitions, be innovative, foster respect for and among all partners in the county's legal/judicial system, and run an office that is fair and honest in all of its dealings with everyone. The DA must also commit to recruiting lawyers from all cultural and ethnic backgrounds to ensure that we reflect the diverse population in Santa Clara County.

I have been fortunate to have worked with many police officers over the course of my career, and enjoy the unanimous support of every law enforcement organization which has endorsed a candidate in this race. I have also worked extensively with private attorneys, including criminal defense and family lawyers, and earned the endorsement of the Santa Clara County Bar Association.

Answer from Karyn Sinunu:

Currently, I am on leave to campaign full time. As the top prosecutor to the District Attorney, I supervised 188 attorneys and all 90 DA detectives. And in Mr. Kennedy's absence, I was the district attorney. I believe that Mr. Kennedy entrusted me with this position in large part, because I am a self-starter. I set high standards, work hard to reach them and try to inspire others to do the same.

For example, when the unsolved homicide of a little girl from 1982 came to my attention years later, I reviewed the case history and saw flaws throughout the investigation. Most errors and omissions came down to failures to communicate and follow up; individuals in the system were not working together. So I brought together representatives from police departments, the medical community, social services, victim/witness services and the county coroner to form a child abuse task force. We worked collaboratively to create a best-practices guide to child abuse investigation. Eventually, I persuaded all 13 Police Chiefs and the Sheriff to sign on to it. I am proud to have contributed the Santa Clara County Child Abuse Protocol to the community. This is the first protocol of its kind in California.

When California enacted laws against hate crimes, I was asked to supervise their prosecution. Seeing that there was no guide for prosecutors on how to try those cases, I wrote the one that is used statewide. And when the Victim's Bill of Rights passed in 1994, there was no compendium on the subject, so I created the Victims' Rights Handbook, also used statewide.

More recently, I invigorated the District Attorney's Cold Case unit and Innocence Project to take full advantage of recent breakthroughs in DNA technology to find the truth and to solve crimes.

As the chief assistant, I chaired the weekly District Attorney management meetings, setting the agenda to improve office procedures, effectiveness and morale. I have sat on the death penalty, hiring and 3-strikes committees.

In the past I have supervised the homicide, sexual assault, domestic violence, narcotics, hate crimes, and officer-involved cases, making charging, strategy and trial tactics decisions.

When I first moved into administration in 1994, I reformed office hiring and promotion practices by raising standards and requirements, and by increasing diversity. Since then I have extensive personnel management experience, including confidential and sensitive investigations into alleged misconduct. My goal is to do best for the community by educating my staff and disciplining them when necessary.

As the office media coordinator for many years, I increased public awareness of the workings of this office, within the limits of the law prohibiting comment on personnel issues or criminal investigations. I am known to be forthright and honest.

A career prosecutor, with 20 years of service, I tried 50 jury trials, including a special circumstances-double murder. I am honored to have been awarded the Napoleon Menard Trial Advocacy Award. Three of my cases were published because they made significant changes in the law.

As a member of the O'Connor Hospital Bioethics Committee, I was privileged to contribute my thoughts on issues facing patients and their physicians in their most private and fundamentally important choices.

I volunteer my time and labor with Habitat for Humanity and Rotary International, because I am committed to the betterment of my community and believe in public service.

Answer from Karyn Sinunu:

When the office came under media scrutiny early this year, I welcomed it. In order to maintain both the highest ethical standards and effective prosecutions, we must continually educate our attorneys and listen to criticism from wherever it comes. However, as the people's elected chief law enforcement officer, the District Attorney alone is responsible for the operation of her offices. I accept that responsibility and promise to strive for the highest professional standards in the office.

Emphasize Ethics and Professionalism:

To highlight the preeminence of ethics and professionalism as first principles of the District Attorney, I will create the position of Ethics and Training Officer. The Officer will advise front-line trial attorneys on questions of law and ethics as they arise in trial.

Emphasize Commitment to Truth and Fairness:

I have already instituted many changes in attorney hiring, evaluation and promotion to emphasize professionalism and ethical prosecution. I will not alter my commitment to fairness, I but will continue to look and listen for ways to improve.

Increase Openness and Accountability:

The office and the community will benefit from increased openness. I will convene the District Attorney's Advisory Forum, at which diverse community leaders and I will meet quarterly in a frank exchange of ideas and opinions.

Answer from Dolores A. Carr:

The ongoing Mercury News series on the criminal justice system in Santa Clara County has revealed troubling ethical behavior on the part of certain prosecutors in the Office and failures by senior management who ignored warnings from the rest of the criminal justice community, including judges and defense attorneys. The fallout has damaged the credibility of the Office and called into question its role in the administration of justice.

This is a crisis of leadership, and it will take more than proclamations of willingness to be "open", "accept criticism", and meet with community groups to solve it. My diverse experience as a prosecutor, a judge, and a private defense attorney will make the difference. My broad perspective on management practices both inside--and outside--of the District Attorney's Office will guide me in making the management and policy changes necessary to reduce unethical behavior. My credibility with various stakeholders throughout the criminal justice system will ensure that problems are identified--and fixed--before they get to the point that a newspaper has to tell the public what is going on in our own office.

One challenge which has yet to be met is identifying all of the problems and holding managers accountable for ethical failures. For example, months after the Mercury News series, senior management has failed to move errant trial lawyers out of trial assignments, including the homicide unit. The vast majority of prosecutors are ethical, dedicated, and talented lawyers; it is past time for managers to reassign the very few lawyers who have besmirched their reputations.

However, eliminating unethical behavior is not the only urgent issue confronting the next District Attorney. There is much to do in improving the productivity, efficiency, and morale of the staff.

When I started my 15 year career in the District Attorney's Office, managers spent most of their time developing great lawyers. They would evaluate lawyers by watching them in court, scrutinizing their written work, and seeking opinions about their performance from judges and defense lawyers. Trial attorneys would be allowed the discretion to make decisions; managers would review those decisions to assess their readiness to handle more important cases.

That traditional management system is eroding steadily. Virtually every prosecutor must now obtain approval from a manager before making or accepting a settlement offer. Even straightforward tasks, such as appearing in court when a defendant pleads guilty, require prosecutors to fill out endless forms. Monitoring has replaced mentoring. This translates into higher caseloads, more harried and mistake-prone attorneys, and lower productivity and morale. I will revamp the culture to emphasize the development of judgment and technical skills as goals in and of themselves, and make them critical criteria for hiring and promotion. When professionals are encouraged to make professional judgments, productivity, efficiency, and morale will improve.

The final challenge is to identify and promote managers who possess the leadership skills necessary to make those changes. Top managers must show that they can work fairly with all stakeholders, including the courts and defense attorneys. Leaders must offer more than political skills--they must have solid management achievements and the people skills necessary to direct an organization. I will bring those leadership skills to the job of District Attorney.

Answer from Karyn Sinunu:

In an era of high demand for government dollars, we are all required to use our ingenuity to increase effectiveness with less. Our office needs more resources, and I will continue to create opportunities for collaborations that save money. One very important source is grant funds: state and federal dollars are available to supplement the DA's budget. As I have always done, I will continue to pursue all outside sources.

Answer from Dolores A. Carr:

Although every county department would like to have its budget increased, this will be a difficult task given the current fiscal situation. My answer to the previous question suggests some of the ways in which I will increase the productivity and efficiency of DA staff. I will also seek additional funding from federal, state, and local sources for functions ranging from high-technology crime prosecution to insurance fraud.

Some adjustments in staffing will also save money. For example, our Investigations Unit has more than enough senior peace officers; we could curtail our hiring of retired police officers in favor of hiring and training new (and less expensive) investigators. Careful spending on technology based on our existing network resources, such as moving from paper to electronic case files, will also save staff time and money going forward. As a candidate with widespread support among police departments, I am best placed to work on cooperative ventures (e.g., filing and processing police reports electronically) which will lead to savings and better service to the public. I am aware that technology spending can be a boon or a waste of taxpayer dollars. I will use my experience as a manager to ensure that any such spending yields results.

Finally, I am confident that my positive relationships with the Public Defender, the Sheriff, and the courts will help in our identifying areas (e.g., holding video arraignments at the jail rather than transporting in-custody defendants to court) which will save money for other parts of the criminal justice system--and that some of that savings will be credited back to the DA's Office so that we can strengthen our ability to maintain quality services for our community.

I have a proven track record of managing resources and personnel effectively, and will make the changes necessary to ensure that the DA's Office handles its cases as efficiently and quickly as possible. With my broad experience within the criminal justice system, I can count on colleagues throughout the county assisting us in identifying and implementing cost savings. I also have an excellent relationship with the Board of Supervisors, the group which approves the District Attorney's budget for the office. I am proud to have the endorsement of the only Supervisors who have endorsed a candidate in this race: Jim Beall, Don Gage, and Pete McHugh.

The order of the candidates is random and changes daily. Candidates who did not respond are not listed on this page.