This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ny/wst/ for current information.
LWV logo League of Women Voters of New York Education Fund
Smart Voter logo
Westchester County, NY November 8, 2005 Election
Council Member; City of Peekskill Voter Information

Salary: $8,686

Candidate Statements: Each candidate was asked to make a statement of 30 words or less commenting on what they would like the voters to know about them, their experience, accomplishments, philosophy.

Results as of Nov 23 2:31pm, 100% of Precincts Reporting (23/23)
Candidates (Vote for 3)

Drew Claxton 2,323 votes 18%

  • Party: Democratic, Working Families
  • Occupation: Sr. Consultant, Natl. Econ. Research Assn.; City Council Member
  • Residence: Peekskill
  • Education: B.A. (Econ.), SUNY/Purchase '82; M.A., (Econ.), NYU.,'90
  • Statement: Peekskill needs a long term financial and strategic plan to stabilize taxes, revitalize our downtown shopping district, support existing businesses, attract new ones, and protect and revitalize our residential neighborhoods.
Catherine E. Pisani 2,271 votes 17%
  • Party: Republican, Independence, Conservative
  • Occupation: Teacher, Peekskill H.S. (since'74); City Council Member
  • Residence: Peekskill
  • Education: B.S., Coll. of St. Rose,'74; M.S., Fordham U., '78
  • Statement: Peekskill's revitalization: open space; govt.; public safety measures; community amenities; economic devt.; balanced historic preservation; jobs; workforce, affordable housing; responsible budgeting; tourism; enhanced code enforcement; youth programs; quality of life.
Mary F. Foster 2,205 votes 17%
  • Party: Democratic, Working Families
  • Occupation: Partner, Deloitte & Touche LLP
  • Residence: Peekskill
  • Education: B.B.A., Pace U., '75; M.B.A., Pace U., '76; C.P.A., '78
  • Statement: Reduce taxes; increase financial stability through bus. devt., and requiring condominium developers to contribute fair share for amenities and city services; partner with School District on continuous improvement of schools.
Ruth A. Wells 2,148 votes 16%
  • Party: Democratic, Working Families
  • Occupation: Art Director, ABC Inc., One Life to Live
  • Residence: Peekskill
  • Education: B.A. (Religion), Oberlin Coll., '69; M.F.A. (Set/Costume Design), Temple U., '81
  • Statement: Peekskill needs long term budgeting to control taxes, community driven comprehensive planning to shape devt. and the revitalization of older neighborhoods, downtown and infrastructure, more workforce housing, improved community relations.
William Schmidt 2,092 votes 16%
  • Party: Republican, Independence, Conservative
  • Occupation: Claims Director: N.Y.S. Insurance Dept.; City Council Member
  • Residence: Peekskill
  • Education: Regents Diploma, Peekskill H.S. '73; B.A. (Govt.), St. John's U., '77
  • Statement: I seek reelection to complete job of bringing quality commercial and residential devt. to Peekskill; preserving our quality of life through strict code enforcement, and cleanup of polluted industrial sites.
Diana Burruss 1,999 votes 15%
  • Party: Republican, Independence, Conservative
  • Occupation: V.P., JPMorgan Chase Bank
  • Residence: Peekskill
  • Education: B.S. (Marketing), Marymount Coll., '93; M.S. (Organizational Leadership) Mercy Coll.,'01
  • Statement: Revitalization of the downtown and riverfront, affordable housing, job creation, bus. devt., code enforcement, safe streets for the young and elderly, attract new bus. to support the tax base.

Basic candidate data supplied by the applicable elections official. Order of candidates is random and changes daily.
 
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter || Feedback


Created: January 28, 2006 14:51 PST
Smart Voter   <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.