This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sn/ for current information.
SMART VOTER by the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund LWV
providing personalized comprehensive nonpartisan voter information any time you want it.
California
Smart Voter
Sonoma County Ballot

19020 OLD MONTE RIO RD, 95446

See Also:   Information for the County of Sonoma
(Elections Office, local League of Women Voters, links to other county election sites)

November 8, 2005 Election

--------
County Results as of Jan 28 2:46pm, 100% of Precincts Reporting (307/307)
69.6% Countywide Voter Turnout (167,854/241,026)

Statewide Results as of Nov 23 4:01pm, 100% of Precincts Reporting (17726/17726)
49.1% Statewide Voter Turnout (7,813,919/15,891,482)

School | Special District | State Propositions | Local Measures
Click on Name of Contest below.
Polling Location on November 8, 7am - 8pm
Monte Rio School
Library
20700 Foothill Dr
Monte Rio, CA 95462
[Poll data last updated 2005/11/08 20:03]
Showing a polling place for this address does not mean that you are registered to vote.
Precinct 5052H
Ballot Type 3
How do I vote? See a description of the voting system you will use at your polling place.
  • FAQs about Voting and this ballot page
  • How we got this information
  • Report problems or errors

  • Special District

    Board Member, 4 Year; Monte Rio Recreation and Park DistrictClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (2 Elected)

    • Suzi Schaffert
      305 votes 31.3%
    • Jim Kokalis
      235 votes 24.1%
    • Jay Steele
      220 votes 22.6%
    • Richard G. Davis
      214 votes 22.0%

    Board Member; Monte Rio Recreation and Park DistrictClick here for more info on this contest including known links to other sites (2 Elected)

    • Cynthia "T" Thomas
      325 votes 39.6%
    • Gretchen L. Mino
      277 votes 33.7%
    • Arthur "Wolfgang" Huttick
      219 votes 26.7%

    State Propositions

    Proposition 73 Waiting Period and Parental Notification Before Termination of Minor's Pregnancy
    Fail: 3,610,475 / 47.3% Yes votes ...... 4,023,840 / 52.7% No votes
    Should the California Constitution be amended to require notification of the parent or legal guardian of an unemancipated, pregnant minor at least 48 hours before performing an abortion on the minor?

    Proposition 74 Public School Teachers. Waiting Period for Permanent Status. Dismissal
    Fail: 3,450,331 / 44.9% Yes votes ...... 4,241,972 / 55.1% No votes
    Should the probationary period for public school teachers be increased from two to five years, and should the process by which school boards can dismiss a permanent certificated employee be modified?

    Proposition 75 Public Employee Union Dues. Restrictions on Political Contributions. Employee Consent Requirement
    Fail: 3,575,521 / 46.5% Yes votes ...... 4,106,481 / 53.5% No votes
    Should public employee unions be required to obtain annual written consent from each member in order to use a portion of that member's dues for political activity?

    Proposition 76 State Spending and School Funding Limits
    Fail: 2,898,836 / 37.8% Yes votes ...... 4,775,219 / 62.2% No votes
    Should Californians make major Constitutional changes to create an additional state spending limit, grant the governor substantial new power to unilaterally reduce state spending, and revise key provisions relating to Proposition 98, school and community college funding, and transportation funding authorized by Proposition 42?

    Proposition 77 Redistricting. Initiative Constitutional Amendment
    Fail: 3,073,346 / 40.3% Yes votes ...... 4,548,276 / 59.7% No votes
    Should the California Constitution be amended to change the process of redistricting California's State Senate, State Assembly, Congressional and Board of Equalization districts, transferring the implementation of redistricting from the Legislature to a panel of three retired judges, selected by legislative leaders?

    Proposition 78 Discounts on Prescription Drugs
    Fail: 3,137,858 / 41.5% Yes votes ...... 4,421,298 / 58.5% No votes
    Should the state adopt a new state drug discount program to reduce the costs of prescription drugs for Californians at or below 300 percent of the federal poverty level?

    Proposition 79 Prescription Drug Discounts. State-Negotiated Rebates
    Fail: 2,940,106 / 39.3% Yes votes ...... 4,541,256 / 60.7% No votes
    Should the state of California create a new prescription drug discount program for residents at or below 400 percent of the federal poverty level, and change state law to make it illegal to engage in profiteering from the sale of prescription drugs?

    Proposition 80 Electric Service Providers. Regulation
    Fail: 2,532,094 / 34.4% Yes votes ...... 4,825,010 / 65.6% No votes
    Should the state expand its regulation of the electric industry?

    Local Measures

    Measure M Genetically Engineered Organism Nuisance Abatement Ordinance -- County of Sonoma (Majority Approval Required)
    Fail: 73,670 / 44.8% Yes votes ...... 90,658 / 55.2% No votes
    Shall the "Sonoma County Genetically Engineered Organism Nuisance Abatement Ordinance" which would, for at least the next ten years: (1) prohibit the raising, growing, propagation, cultivation, sale, or distribution of most genetically engineered organisms; (2) require the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner to enforce the ordinance by, after a hearing, confiscating and destroying the genetically engineered organisms; and (3) provide for fines and fees for each violation, be adopted?

    The order of the contests and candidates on this ballot representation is NOT necessarily the same as your county's official ballot.
    If you print and mark your choices on this page and take it to the polls instead of an official sample ballot, be very careful.


    Home || Sonoma Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback || Donate to Us
    Data Created: January 28, 2006 14:46 PST
    Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
    Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
    The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.