This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sd/ for current information. |
San Diego County, CA | November 2, 2004 Election |
A Plan for Struggling and Accelerated StudentsBy Jayne ChaffinCandidate for Board Member; Del Mar Union Elementary School District | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
As parents, we all want to know that our children are getting an excellent education yet - 20% of the students in our school district are below the state and federal requirement level of "proficient" based on their most recent STAR tests.These data are based on our students' raw scores and not based on a bell curve. This is equivalent to 20% failing their high school exit exam - and we need a plan by our school board to address it. In fact, in accordance with state and federal law, all schools must have 100% of their students score at the proficient or above level by 2013-14. In my research about our schools, I've also been surprised to learn that despite our schools' great API scores, some of our schools just don't compare well to similiar schools in California with comparable demographics and parent education levels. In fact, our schools together only rank a 6 on a 10-point scale (10 is best). The chart below shows by school how each of our six schools has performed based on data obtained from these two websites: http://star.cde.ca.gov/star2004 and http://www.greatschools.net.
Del Mar Union School District
I'm not saying our schools aren't excellent. I'm just saying there's still room for improvement and that this improvement will significantly impact the 913 students who are struggling to pass the STAR and meet their grade level curriculum standards. As a new board member how would I address it? I'd seek support from my fellow board members to make it one of our top three strategic planning issues that we address without delay. I'd want our educators to use their collaborative Wednesday time to dig into the data, examine the test scores carefully, interview experts and draft a plan for each grade level at each school site that addresses struggling as well as accelerated students. For the struggling students, I'd want our educators to identify the causes and proposed remedies based on objective research - we'd be on the leading edge and that's a good thing. I'd then want our educators to identify changes needed in the proposed curriculum, the schedule of the school day, textbooks, homework, tutoring, and any other resources or changes they feel they need. Then the Board should submit it to a broad-based community input process as I've described as part of my call for a revised strategic planning process. This plan must have timelines, measurable benchmarks and accountabilities for me to adopt it as a board member. I'll work hard to champion this challenge with innovative new programs, like after-school, weekend and summer tutoring and mentoring programs that are tailored to the individual needs of our students. I'll be a clear voice for a strategic plan with solutions to close these achievement gaps and achieve success for all our students. My vision is a future where all children receive world-class educations from schools with satisfied educators and parents working together to improve student achievement through differentiated instructional strategies, individualized learning programs and support from the local community. I see our schools as the models that others will emulate across our nation as we work together to address our struggling and accelerated students. About Their Letter to the Editor of the Carmel Valley Newspaper October 15, 2004..... In their Oct. 15th Letter to the Editor of the Carmel Valley Newspaper, current school board members Janet Lamborghini and Linda Crawford wrote that my statement "20% of students in our school district recently scored below the required level" shows a lack of knowledge on my part and that "the community shouldn't rush to judgment on a complex issue." Actually they never disagreed with the 20% number. While they claimed that "standardized test results have improved steadily during the past five years," they don't offer any data to support their claim. The fact is, the 20% is unchanged from the year before and our academic scores only improved by 1 % in the entire school district. But this isn't a question of data + this is a question about why these 913 children aren't important enough for these two incumbent school board members to offer a plan to help them + instead they point at the 80% of the children and say our schools are doing great for them. All they say is we should get there by 2013-2014. But I say that these 913 students will be out of high school by then and can't afford the complacency of board members who have given up on them. We need a plan of action and we need board members who care enough to get it done. How's Your School Doing? I've summarized the data from the two websites shown above by each of our schools.
|
Next Page:
Position Paper 3
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
November 2004 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
ca/sd
Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 27, 2004 09:28
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright ©
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.