This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/scz/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
Smart Voter
Santa Cruz County, CA November 2, 2004 Election
Measure T
911 Fee Repeal
City of Watsonville

3,516 / 37.3% Yes votes ...... 5,904 / 62.7% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Nov 23 10:56am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (21/21)
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text

Shall the City of Watsonville repeal Chapter 3-15, Emergency Response Fee, of the Watsonville Municipal Code which authorizes a fee to pay the cost of operating Watsonville's share of the Santa Cruz County 911 communication system?

Impartial Analysis from City Attorney
This ballot measure, if adopted, would repeal the City of Watsonville Emergency Response Fee set forth in Chapter 3-15 of the Watsonville Municipal Code. The fee is used to pay for a portion of the City's share of the cost of operating the Santa Cruz Consolidated Emergency Communications Center, Joint Powers Authority. The fee is collected with the telephone bill. The fee is $2.00 per month per residential account line; $2.00 per business access line, not to exceed $18.00 per month; and $18.00 per month per account per service location.

s/ Alan J. Smith

  News and Analysis

Watsonville Register-Pajaronian

Santa Cruz Sentinel
Suggest a link related to Measure T
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure T Arguments Against Measure T
YES, it is time for us to tell the government to remove this new phone tax. By voting YES on Measure T the voters will keep their phone bills affordable and will send a message to the government to stop playing crooked games with the budget from Sacramento down to cities like Watsonville.

In 2003, the City Council voted for a new telephone tax to pay for the Emergency 911 Service despite public protest and despite the fact that they were violating State Law in doing so without a public vote first. Shame on the Council! The problem with the new tax is that it is both dishonest as well as a bad deal for the people. The 911 service is already being paid for by us through an existing charge on our phone bills and through the regular taxes that we are paying to the City. With this new phone tax, we would end up paying twice. As any smart shopper knows: Paying twice the price for the same merchandise is not nice!

Also, this is not a public safety issue. The City cannot legally stop supplying 911 Service to Watsonville. The 911 Service must be made available whether this new city phone tax is collected or not. The real issue is out-of-control government spending. Over and over again, the City claims to have a financial crisis even though their budget balloons when they pass another tax that workers and retirees alike have to pay for.

Be a smart shopper and put some limits on out-of-control taxing and spending. Vote YES on Measure T.

s/ Nick Bulaich, Circulator Of Petition
s/ Rick Machado
s/ Alice P. Bankhead
s/ Dan Hernandez, Member of Parents United
s/ Robert Price, Business Owner

The City of Watsonville participates in a joint powers authority to provide emergency dispatch throughout Santa Cruz County. When calling 911, all landlines in the City access the Santa Cruz Consolidated Emergency Communications Center (SCCECC).

Until now, the City has been able to fund this service to the community, but due to State budget cuts and the slowdown in the economy, the City Council has to make cuts in other public safety services in order to fund 911. The City Council has approved a $2.00 per month, per residence, fee to help pay for this special service. Homes receiving Lifeline service (discounted telephone service for low income families, seniors and others) will not be required to pay, and the City's General Fund will pay for their portion of the costs. The SCCECC services are so state of the art and outstanding, that it is one of the first agencies in California to have earned the coveted and prestigious Public Safety Communications Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) award.

Imagine calling 911 and not receiving life-saving response for your loved ones. Every minute saved by the paramedics increases survival! We believe that you want to make sure that the Police come as fast as possible when you find yourself in danger.

The emergency response fee is directly related to the cost of providing the 911 services to all residential and business phones within Watsonville's City limits. The fee's sole purpose is to pay for this significant benefit.

Vote NO on Measure T and make sure that the state of the art service available to you today is there the next time you have to make that 911 call!

Vote NO on Measure T. $2.00 a month could save the life of a loved one!

s/ Judy Doering-Nielsen, Mayor, City of Watsonville
s/ Ben Evans, Fire Chief
s/ Terry A. Medina, Police Chief
s/ Kirt Vojvoda, Firefighter, Watsonville Fire Dept.
s/ Rachel Mayo, Watsonville Resident

Full Text of Measure T
AN ORDINANCE OF THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE REPEALING CHAPTER 3-15 EMERGENCY RESPONSE FEE OF TITLE 3 (FINANCE) OF THE WATSONVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE

Repeals Ordinance No. 1163-03 (CM)

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ENACTMENT. Chapter 3-15 (Emergency Response Fee) of Title 3 (Finance) of the Watsonville Municipal Code is hereby repealed by a measure of the voters of the City of Watsonville.

SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in force and take effect ten (10) days after the official canvass of the November 2, 2004, Special Municipal Election pursuant to California Election Code Section 9217.


Santa Cruz Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: December 15, 2004 13:34 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.