This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sn/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California
Smart Voter
Sonoma County, CA November 4, 2003 Election
Measure C
Charter Amendment
City of Petaluma

Charter Amendment - Majority Approval Required

3,828 / 34.7% Yes votes ...... 7,215 / 65.3% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Nov 7 4:28pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (16/16)
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

Shall the City of Petaluma Charter be amended to allow for the adoption of a special utility user's tax on gas and electric service for 20 years, at a rate of no more than five percent (5%) of the monthly charge for the service, to pay for curb-to-curb repair and reconstruction of existing City Streets and not for the construction of new streets?

Impartial Analysis from the City Attorney
The Petaluma City Council has placed Measure C on the November 4, 2003 ballot asking voters to amend the Petaluma City Charter to permit the adoption of a special utility users tax.

Section 63.6 of the Charter currently prohibits the City Council or its staff from levying, imposing or collecting a tax upon the use in the City by any resdential user, business user or any other user of telephone, communication services whether intrastate or interstate, electrical energy, gas, water, garbage, cable television or any other use of utilities by residents of Petaluma.

Measure C, if passed by the voters would amend Section 63.6 of the Charter to provide an exception and allow for the levying and collection by the City Council of a tax upon the use of electricity and gas in the City of Petaluma by any residential user, business user, industrial user or any other user. Such tax would be limited to no more than twenty (20) years and could not exceed 5% of each monthly charge for the electric or gas service. The revenue from such tax would be used only for curb-to-curb repair and reconstruction of existing City streets and not for the construction of new streets.

Even if Measure C passes, any such tax could not be levied or collected unless the voters vote to impose such a tax through a separate ballot measure. The City Council has placed a separate companion measure, Measure D, on the November 4, 2003 ballot, seeking voter approval for the actual imposition of the utility users tax.

Measure C would only become effective if approved by a majority of the voters voting on the November 4, 2003 election.

  Official Information

Documents related to the measure in PDF format

News and Analysis

Petaluma Argus-Courier

Suggest a link related to Measure C
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure C Arguments Against Measure C
In order to assess a utility tax for the limited purpose of fixing existing streets, we need to amend our Petaluma city charter. A yes vote on Measure C would allow us to make this essential amendment.

This measure has been carefully crafted to ensure that the limits our charter places on utility taxes will be altered only for the current proposed tax, and will not open the door for future assessments on utilities without additional charter amendments.

In addition, this measure allows only gas and electric utilities to be taxed, up to a maximum of 5%. In fact, the measure allows future city councils to reduce the tax if they deem these funds are not necessary to repair streets, but does not allow these same councils to increase the tax.

In other words, this charter amendment is specifically designed to help Petaluma cope with the current fiscal crisis without opening the door to unwanted taxation or runaway spending in the future.

A utility tax is the fairest and most equitable tax available to fix the streets. Both businesses and residents will contribute. Santa Rosa has had a 5% tax on five different utilities for many years without creating undue hardships or problems. Petaluma will tax only two utilities--gas and electric.

Measure C is a rational, appropriate means of helping us to address current needs responsibly while preserving the intent of our charter, which is to limit unnecessary spending by our elected officials.

The committtee of citizens, which worked eight long months to create solutions that are in the best interest of our entire community, created the important safeguards which allow us to realistically address our problem--streets that are among the very worst in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Vote yes on Measure C.

CITIZENS COMMITTEE ON STREET REPAIR
Mark Albertson, Co-Chair

David A. Glass
Mayor of Petaluma

PETALUMA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
John Burns, President

Dave King
Youth Commissioner/Business Owner

PEACE OFFICERS ASSN. OF PETALUMA
Steven Johnson, President

Have you ever felt like crying out to your city government, "What have you done with my money???" We paid our share of taxes, but where did the money go? Now the City of Petaluma is asking you to approve Measure C a charter amendment which will allow for the adoption of a special utility users tax to pay for repair and reconstruction of streets. The taxpayers of Petaluma are already paying high taxes and the primary purpose of these taxes, aside from public safety, is to provide for infrastructure, including street maintenance. Instead of asking the Petaluma residents to take on an additional tax burden, the City government should have had the political will to reprioritize the budget and redirect funds from non-essential services to fund the much needed street repairs. In essence the City Council and management is passing the buck to the voters. We urge you to send a message to your city government that street repairs are definitely required, but work with the existing budget and get it done. Vote No on Measure C.

SONOMA COUNTY TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION
Spencer Flournoy, President
John Landis, Vice President
Jack Atkin, Treasurer
Fred Levin, Executive Director
Jeanne Levin, Past Pres./Director


Sonoma Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: December 19, 2003 15:08 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.