1,736 / 67.9% Yes votes ...... 822 / 32.1% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

• creates a dedicated revenue stream for children, youth and family services, including senior citizen services, by annually setting aside ten percent (10%) of transient occupancy (hotel) tax revenue to support comprehensive, integrated and community-based systems of services, so as to promote individual and community health, recreation and cultural arts.

• clarifies that this dedicated revenue stream is to be used exclusively by non-profit service providers in East Palo Alto or the majority of whose client population resides in East Palo Alto.

The City's transient occupancy (hotel) tax, as set forth in Ordinance No. 230, was adopted by voters in 1998. It is projected the tax will begin generating annual revenues of $2 million in 2004 with the completion of the `Four Seasons Hotel' in the University Circle development area. The hotel tax is paid by the hotel patron as a surcharge on the hotel room rate. Ordinance No. 230 currently provides that hotel tax revenues go into the City's General Fund for general government purposes.

This measure, if adopted, would require that 10% of hotel tax revenues, approximately $200,000 annually, be dedicated exclusively for children, youth and family services, including senior citizen services, to support comprehensive, integrated and community-based systems of services and support systems, so as to promote individual and community health, recreation and cultural arts.

This measure establishes procedures for funding said services with an emphasis on non-profit providers in East Palo Alto or a majority of whose client population resides in East Palo Alto. This measure requires the City Council to develop funding priorities and the city manager to develop funding criteria. Funding proposals are to be reviewed by advisory agencies to allow the Council to make decisions during the annual budget process.

/s/ Michael S. Lawson
City Attorney, City of East Palo Alto

Election Information in Spanish

Election Information in Chinese

For information about the City of East Palo Alto

We would like you to dedicate a portion of the new HOTEL TAX to children, youth and family services.

Measure I dedicates ten percent (10%) of the new HOTEL TAX to children, youth, and family services, including services for senior residents. Each year, with the advice of a Community Advisory Committee, the money will go out as grants to non-profit community organizations to provide services. These organizations will be audited and held accountable for measurable results.

Vote "YES" on Measure I to assure that high-quality services for children, youth, families, and senior residents will always remain a city priority, and be among the benefits of progress.

The City Council voted unanimously to place this measure on the ballot.

/s/ Duane Bay
Mayor

/s/ Patricia Foster
Vice Mayor

/s/ Donna Rutherford
Council Member

/s/ Sharifa Wilson
Council Member and Former Mayor

Since incorporation no City Council implemented a plan for affordable housing, children, youth, family services and seniors. These are so closely related as to be one - human services. Our City had an opportunity to reserve affordable housing in the Home Depot area. But homes were cruelly destroyed on Clarke by the Redevelopment Agency. Homes donated to the City were refused. And, one of the homes accepted for affordable housing was destroyed by a backhoe at Clarke and Bay directed of the City Council.

The "hotel" will allegedly collect $100,000 yearly for affordable housing and an equal amount for human services. We are aware that homes cost from $350,000 to over $650,000. The proposed $100,000 for affordable housing and the $100,000 for human services is not nearly enough to scratch the surface of City's needs, but it is enough to hire consultants to tell us we need more funds.

No serious comprehensive City programs in these areas have been proposed or acted upon since we have been a city. For almost twenty years City Government has ignored these groups. The proponents of Measure I tell us that if we approve this Hotel tax on a "hotel" to be built four years from now, all will be well. HOGWASH! VOTE NO ON MEASURE I.

/s/ Bobby Brown

/s/ Keisha A. Evans

/s/ Bernice Avery

/s/ A. Peter Evans

Hotel Tax without a hotel? This is an example of our incompetent City Government. This is also another Heartbreak Hotel, just like the one in the sixties that also did not exist. The City Council has absolute authority to spend our General Funds. We do not need a ballot measure to spend money for Youth, Family Services, Seniors, or Affordable Housing. Historically in our city these groups have been neglected. Measures I and J are not the solution. We need properly planned programs to spend General Fund money in these areas, not a ballot measure. Measures I and J are funds to pay consultants to tell us that we do not have enough money for Youth, Family Services, Senior Programs and Affordable Housing. Additionally the money cannot be spent until it is collected. These measures are to blindly designate the Hotel Tax four years before the hotel is alleged to be built. Remember the Utility Tax was collected for eight years illegally. If you remember Elvis' Heartbreak Hotel, you also may remember the song `What Kind of Fool Do You Think I Am?'

Vote No on Measures I and J.

/s/ A. Peter Evans
Tax Payer

/s/ Bernice Avery
Tax Payer

/s/ Bobby Brown
Tax Payer

/s/ Keisha A. Evans
Taxpayer

THE HOTEL TAX IS ALREADY IN PLACE. Measure I just makes sure that at least ten percent (10%) of it goes to services for children, youth, families, and senior residents.

When the HOTEL TAX was put in place, the voters left it up to future City Councils to decide what part of the city budget the HOTEL TAX should be spent for.

The current City Council unanimously recommends that the voters now make it a legal requirement that all future City Councils allocate some of the new HOTEL TAX to services for children, youth and families, including seniors.

We agree with them. We must guarantee that high-quality services for children, youth, families, and senior residents will always remain a city priority, and be among the benefits of progress.

Vote YES on Measure I.

/s/ Rose Jacobs-Gibson
County Supervisor, Former Mayor

/s/ Barbara A. Mouton
Former Mayor

/s/ Gertrude Wilks
Former Council Member

/s/ Alfred LeGrand-Sawyer
Resident

/s/ Rebecca Hill-Long
Resident

BE IT ORDAINED by the People of the City of East Palo Alto as follows:

Ordinance No. 230, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO IMPOSING A TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX ON THE OCCUPANCY OF HOTELS AND SIMILAR SHORT-TERM LODGING AND PROVIDING FOR AN ELECTION THEREON, is amended as follows:

SECTION 1. DEDICATION OF 10 PERCENT OF REVENUES TO CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES,INCLUDING SENIOR CITIZENS

Section 15 of Ordinance No. 230, is hereby amended to read as follows:

(a) Notwithstanding the foregoing provision, not less than ten (10)percent (%) of the revenues collected annually pursuant to this Ordinance shall be dedicated to and used exclusively for children, youth and family services, including senior citizens, residing in the City. It is the intent of this Ordinance to support comprehensive, integrated and community-based systems of services and support systems for children, youth and their families and senior citizens, so as to promote individual and community health, recreation and cultural arts.

(b) Funds shall be used exclusively for grants or loans to non-profit service providers headquartered in East Palo Alto or for which a majority of clients served are East Palo Alto resident.

(c) At such time as funds become available, the City Council shall annually establish priorities and direct the City Manager to develop funding criteria, which shall be approved by the Council, and to solicit proposals from eligible non-profit service providers headquartered in East Palo Alto. Funding proposals shall be reviewed by the Community Services Commission and/or such other bodies as directed by the Council, the membership of which shall be subject to conflict of interest regulations, which shall make recommendations to the Council in a timely fashion so as to allow funding decisions to be made in conjunction with adoption of the City's annual budget.