League of Women Voters of California
| ||||
|
||||
Measure W Proposed Incorporation of the City of Rancho Cordova Proposed City of Rancho Cordova 9,097 / 77.6% Yes votes ...... 2,630 / 22.4% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||
|
Results as of Nov 25 1:17pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (32/32) |
Information shown below: Yes/No Meaning | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | |||||
Shall the order adopted on July 16, 2002, by the Board of Supervisors ordering the incorporation of the territory described in the order and designated in the order as Incorporation of Rancho Cordova, California (12-97) be confirmed subject to the terms and conditions including the annual payment from the City to the County of Sacramento, including the sharing of its revenue with the County of Sacramento and the Property Tax Revenue Agreement between the City and the County of Sacramento commencing in fiscal year 2003-2004 and terminating, as adjusted, no later than after the end of fiscal year 2033-2034; including authorization, as approved by the voters through this measure, for the City to continue to levy and collect within its territory the same general taxes, fees, charges, assessments and rates levied and collected by the County of Sacramento as of November 1, 2002; and, further including approval by the voters through this measure of the Tax Sharing Agreement Between the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova, as more particularly described and set forth in the order?
A general description of the proposed city: That territory south of the centerline of the American River and north and south of Highway 50, generally bounded on the west by Bradshaw Road and on the east by Sunrise Boulevard to Sanders Drive, north of a line through Mather Field to its connection to the Folsom Canal and Sunrise Boulevard. And territory southerly along Sunrise Boulevard to Jackson Highway, and east to Grant Line Road; northeasterly along Grant Line Road to a point that jogs west and then north to White Rock Road, west on White Rock Road and north along parcels lines on Aerojet property as an easterly boundary and along the Folsom South Canal as a westerly boundary; including territory south of Highway 50 along parcel lines east to Hazel Avenue. Incorporation will have no identifiable financial impact upon residents or businesses. The incorporation will not increase taxes. Property, utility, transient occupancy taxes, other taxes, assessments, fees, and parcel charges currently levied will remain the same. The revenue from these taxes and parcel charges will be transferred to the new city and the city will be responsible for providing services supported by these revenues. Services provided include: general municipal government, law enforcement, planning, building inspection, public works and animal control. Some servicesmay be provided through contract. The incorporation does not propose to change services provided by special districts. An independent comprehensive fiscal analysis found the proposed city to be economically feasible. This analysis was based upon the new city providing the same level of service as that currently provided by the County of Sacramento. If approved by the voters, the incorporation would:
|
News and Analysis
|
Arguments For Measure W | Arguments Against Measure W |
Now is the time for Rancho Cordova to become a City!
MeasureWwill bring local control to Rancho Cordova. By keeping our tax dollars
in our neighborhoods, we will be able to improve and increase our services without
raising taxes.
Rancho Cordova is a community with a proud history and great promise for the future, but we face some critical issues.Wemust find real solutions to the issues of crime, drugs, traffic congestion, water quality, and community blight if we are going to create economic opportunity and improve our property values. Today, residents of Rancho Cordova are governed by elected officials who do not live in our community. Our hard-earned tax dollars are siphoned off to other areas of the countywhile our problems go unattended.Wecan no longer afford to wait for the county to address our issues. If we vote yes on Measure W our tax dollars will stay in our neighborhoods. As a city we would control the revenue we collect. We could hire more police to patrol are neighborhoods, build a community and youth center, or create business improvement districts to revitalize our commercial core. For the first time in our history, Rancho Cordova citizens would decidewhat is best for Rancho Cordova. The quality of life in Rancho Cordova is good, and it will improve when we finally have the power and local control necessary to plan for future growth, attack gang violence, keep drug dealers away from our children, control graffiti and provide better security for our homes and business. The time has come for Rancho Cordova to govern itself and control our destiny. Stand up for your community, join us and vote Yes on Measure W. /s Anthony Pescetti, California State Assemblymember /s Roger Benton, Folsom Cordova Unified School Board /s Ed Short, Sacramento County Taxpayers League /s Jane Daly, Vice President, Rancho Cordova Chamber of Commerce /s Mike Mitchum, President, Cordova Community Council
| NO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE W WAS FILED
|