LWV League of Women Voters of California
Smart Voter
Sacramento County, CA November 5, 2002 Election
Measure K
School Improvement and Construction
Roseville Joint Union High School District

Bond Issue

3,626 / 83.6% Yes votes ...... 711 / 16.4% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Nov 25 1:17pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (7/7)
Information shown below: Yes/No Meaning | Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

To relieve school overcrowding and enhance student safety; to design, acquire property, construct and equip a new high school; to provide new classrooms and related facilities on existing campuses, and to remain current with new technology, shall Roseville Joint Union High School District issue $65.3 million of bonds at legal interest rates, appoint a Citizens' Oversight Committee, and perform annual audits to ensure no bond money is used for administrators' salaries?

Meaning of Voting Yes/No
A YES vote of this measure means:
you wish to authorize the issuance and sale up to $65,300,000 of general obligation bonds to be repaid through a property tax based upon the assessed value of the property and the improvements thereon.

A NO vote of this measure means:
you do not wish to authorize the issuance and sale of the bonds.

Impartial Analysis from Placer County Counsel
This measure, if approved by fifty-five percent of the voters voting thereon, would authorize the sale of general obligation bonds of the Roseville Joint Union High School District, ("DISTRICT") for $65,300,000.00.

The District Board of Trustees ("Board") has determined, and has declared in Resolution No. 0064, that certain properties and equipment within the District need to be acquired, constructed, improved, and equipped to enable the District to enhance the educational opportunities of the students in the District. This includes a need to design, acquire property, construct and equip a new high school, to provide new classrooms and related facilities on existing campuses and remain current with new technology to relieve school overcrowding and enhance student safety.

In accordance with the Smaller Classes, Safer Schools and Financial Accountability Act ("Proposition 39"), and related implementing legislation, the Board has determined and resolved the following:

  • to only use the bond proceeds for the purposes set forth in the ballot measure, and not for any other purpose, including teacher or administrator salaries or other operating expense.
  • that it has evaluated the safety, class size reduction and information technology needs of the District prior to determining that a bond issuance is necessary,
  • to have an annual independent performance audit to ensure that the bond proceeds are expended for the school projects stated in the ballot measure,
  • to have an annual, independent financial audit of the expenditure of the bond proceeds until all bond proceeds have been expended,
  • to create a Citizen'sOversight Committee in compliance with Education Code § 15278 no later than immediately following a successful bond election,
  • that the tax levy authorized to secure the bonds of this election shall not exceed $30 per $100,000 of taxable property in the District when assessed valuation is projected by the District to increase in accordance with Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The bonds proposed to be issued and sold would bear interest at a rate not exceeding the statutory limit per annum. The maturity of any bonds issued pursuant to Section 15100 of the Education Code shall have a maturity not exceeding twenty-five (25) years, and bonds issued pursuant to §53506 of the Government Code shall have a maturity date not exceeding forty (40) years. Principal and interest on the bonds would be paid by revenue derived from an annual tax levied upon the taxable property within the District. The Tax Rate Statement of the District, which follows this analysis, presents the District's best estimates of the property tax rates required to be levied to pay debt service on the bonds. The estimates are based on certain assumptions described in the Statement.

  News and Analysis

The Sacramento Bee

Views split over bonds for schools
Sunday, October 13, 2002
Suggest a link related to Measure K
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure K Arguments Against Measure K
Measure K will accomplish two important things for our local schools: relieve school overcrowding and upgrade classroom technology throughout our schools and educational facilities.

First, Measure K will relieve school overcrowding by building a new school and adding new classrooms to existing schools.

Second, Measure K will ensure that our schools are equipped with the most modern technology and computers, giving our students access to the tools they will need to succeed.

Our schools are overcrowded. Soon, the district will be asked to serve 3,000 students over its capacity. If we do not solve our overcrowding problem, our children's education will severely suffer. Measure K will address the overcrowding in our schools.

Measure K will construct new classrooms at our local schools, including Roseville High, Woodcreek High, Oakmont High, Granite Bay High and Adelante High. Measure K will also allow us to build a new high school further relieving the problem of overcrowding. Without this new high school, over 1,200 students will face being bused to schools outside of their community.

Measure K will allow us to ensure that technology increases our students' educational opportunities -- better preparing our students for the technological demands of the 21st century.

Measure K is supported by a broad coalition of community members. Local homeowners, teachers, business owners and parents support Measure K because it will allow us to continue providing a quality educational experience for our students.

By law, not one penny of Measure K funds can be spent on school salaries or administration. All funds must go toward the building of a new school and educational facilities. A Citizen's Oversight Committee will be appointed and will annually review expenditures to ensure that Measure K funds are used as promised.

Please join us in voting Yes on Measure K.

/s Mark Beck, Battalion Chief

/s Sondra M. Myles, Oakmont High School Teacher

/s Roger L. Semple, Roseville Senior Commission Chairman

/s Cathy Macaulay, Parent/Roseville Businesswoman

/s Rex Clark, Sun City-Roseville Community Association, Past President

In 1992, Roseville voters approved another high school bond that will be paid off in year 2019.

Roseville residents have paid the vast majority of the cost for Roseville area High Schools and will pay the lion's share of the cost of a new school in Antelope if this bond measure passes.

Providing the Antelope area with its own school is a luxury that we can't afford. The residents of Antelope purchased their homes with the understanding that their children would attend Woodcreek High School. There was no commitment Roseville residents would pay for a school close to their homes.

Measure K is $14.2 million less than the Measure defeated in March 2002, and there is no bond money to upgrade Roseville schools. The school district is pinning its hopes that the $14.2 million will be made up by the Legislature or state bonds - risking Roseville schools.

The school district has stated that Roseville has the tax base to build a school, but Antelope doesn't.

Antelope parents are unhappy that their children are being bussed to schools out of their neighborhood, but Roseville students have been bussed for years to schools across town.

The school district's policy of open enrollment has created the problem of overcrowding or low enrollment in many schools.

The district has not aggressively explored redistricting or changing school boundaries which could avoid the necessity to build another school. There is a high school in Sacramento County within about one mile of the Antelope development.

It isn't fair to continually ask Roseville residents to build new schools or upgrade older schools because of irresponsible growth.

Vote No on Measure K

/s Hugh Terrell Moss, 35 Year High School Teacher

/s Judy A. German, Roseville Parent

/s Terry Dee Webb, Real Estate Broker


Sacramento Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: December 6, 2002 03:14 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.