League of Women Voters of California
| ||||
|
||||
Measure I Continuation of Gann Appropriations Limit Increase Oak Grove School District Majority approval required 8,489 / 69.7% Yes votes ...... 3,696 / 30.3% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||
|
Information shown below: Yes/No Meaning | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | |||||
Shall the Gann Appropriations Limit increase approved by the voters in 1991 be continued for four years thus allowing the district to continue to expend the funds generated by the existing special tax of $68 per parcel for expenditures for remedial services, repair of school buildngs and grounds, purchase of instructional supplies and equipment, installation of energy conservation equipment, and restoration of services reduced in prior years in the library, counseling, custodial and maintenance areas?
The expenditures will be used to repair school buildings and grounds, to purchase instructional supplies and equipment, to install energy conservation systems, and to restore services reduced in prior years for library, counseling, custodial and maintenance. A "yes" vote is a vote to approve the spending limit for the maximum of four years. A "no" vote is a vote not to approve raising the spending limit for a maximum of four years. Ann Miller Ravel, County Counsel By: Kathryn A. Berry, Deputy County Counsel
|
Official Information
|
Arguments For Measure I |
Oak Grove School District is asking its citizens, via Measure I, to continue the parcel tax approved in 1991. Elections were held in 1994 and 1998 with citizens approving expenditure of the levy proceeds for additional four-year periods.
A community study group has reviewed the district's budget and recommended that the existing parcel tax be continued for another four-year period. 73.6% of voters indicated support for the original parcel tax levy of $68, with proceeds to be used for:
Historically, very few Santa Clara County school districts have had revenue limits lower than Oak Grove School District. Even with recent equalization efforts, our state revenue aid is below the state and county average. A combination of declining enrollment and high energy costs have created serious financial problems resulting in a need for further budget reductions. The district must turn again to its local community for support. Quality education cannot be provided without adequate financial support. The district reduced programs and services by over $8 million in the early to mid-nineties. The 1991 parcel tax softened the impact of limited state funding. Some vital support services had to be reduced, but the district continued providing excellent education for students. Without this continued support, an additional $1.7 million in basic program cuts will be required.
Yvonne Cook, President, Oak Grove School District Board of Trustees Delaine Eastin, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Amelia L. Hill, President, Oak Grove School District, District Parent Advisory Committee Forrest Williams, San Jose City Council, District 2 Rebecca Cohn, Assemblymember, District 24
(No arguments against Measure I were submitted) |