San Mateo County, CA Ballot

Proposition 32 Veterans� Bond Act of 2000
6,709,560 / 67.2% Yes votes ...... 3,278,248 / 32.8% No votes: This act provides for a bond issue of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) to provide farm and home aid for California veterans. Fiscal Impact: Costs of about $858 million over 25 years (average cost of about $34 million per year); costs paid by participating veterans.
Proposition 33 Legislature. Participation In Public Employees� Retirement System
3,791,715 / 39.0% Yes votes ...... 5,941,814 / 61.0% No votes: Allows legislative members to participate in the Public Employees� Retirement System plans in which a majority of state employees may participate. Fiscal Impact: Annual state costs under $1 million to provide retirement benefits to legislators, with these costs replacing other spending from the fixed annual amount provided in support of the Legislature.
Proposition 34 Campaign Contributions and Spending. Limits. Disclosure
5,903,907 / 60.0% Yes votes ...... 3,933,949 / 40.0% No votes: Limits campaign contributions and loans to state candidates and political parties. Provides voluntary spending limits; expands public disclosure requirements and increases penalties. Fiscal Impact: Additional net costs to the state, potentially up to several million dollars annually, and unknown but probably not significant costs to local government.
Proposition 35 Public Works Projects. Use of Private Contractors for Engineering and Architectural Services.
5,442,138 / 55.1% Yes votes ...... 4,428,702 / 44.9% No votes: Amends Constitution eliminating existing restrictions on state, local contracting with private entities for engineering, architectural services; contracts awarded by competitive selection; bidding permitted, not required. Fiscal Impact: Unknown impact on state spending for architectural and engineering services and construction project delivery. Actual impact will depend on how the state uses the contracting flexibility under the proposition.
Proposition 36 Drugs. Probation and Treatment Program
6,199,992 / 60.8% Yes votes ...... 3,991,153 / 39.2% No votes: Requires probation and drug treatment, not incarceration, for possession, use, transportation of controlled substances and similar parole violations, except sale or manufacture. Authorizes dismissal of charges after completion of treatment. Fiscal Impact: Net annual savings of $100 million to $150 million to the state and about $40 million to local governments. Potential avoidance of one-time capital outlay costs to the state of $450 million to $550 million.
Proposition 37 Fees. Vote Requirements. Taxes
4,579,981 / 48.0% Yes votes ...... 4,963,684 / 52.0% No votes: Requires two-thirds vote of State Legislature, majority or two-thirds of local electorate to impose future state, local fees on activity to study or mitigate its environmental, societal or economic effects. Defines such fees as taxes except property, development, certain other fees. Fiscal Impact: Unknown, potentially significant, reduction in future state and local government revenues from making it more difficult to approve certain regulatory charges.
Proposition 38 School Vouchers. State-Funded Private and Religious Education Public School Funding.
3,085,457 / 29.5% Yes votes ...... 7,387,753 / 70.5% No votes: Authorizes annual state payments of at least $4000 per pupil for private/religious schools. Permits replacement of current constitutional public school funding formula. Fiscal Impact: Near-term state costs from zero to $1.1 billion annually. Long-term state impact from $2 billion in annual costs to $3 billion in annual savings, depending on how many public school students shift to private schools.
Proposition 39 School Facilities. 55% Local Vote. Bonds, Taxes Accountability Requirements.
5,402,822 / 53.3% Yes votes ...... 4,733,205 / 46.7% No votes: Authorizes bonds for repair, construction or replacement of school facilities, classrooms, if approved by 55% local vote. Fiscal Impact: Increased bond debt for many school districts. Long-term costs statewide could total in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually. Potential longer-term state savings to the extent school districts assume greater responsibility for funding school facilities.

Local Measures

Measure A Compensation of Board of Supervisors -- San Mateo County (Charter Amendment (Majority Approval Required))
76,559 / 36.0% Yes votes ...... 136,210 / 64.0% No votes: Shall the Charter of the County of San Mateo be amended to so that the compensation of members of the Board of Supervisors be set at an amount not greater than 80% compensation received by a Judge of the Superior Court?
Measure B Crime Laboratory Bonds -- San Mateo County (Bond (2/3 Approval Required))
145,276 / 65.3% Yes votes ...... 77,086 / 34.7% No votes: In order to assist modern effective law enforcement, shall the County of San Mateo be authorized to issue General Obligation Bonds in the amount of $13 million dollars principal ($13,000,000) to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of a crime laboratory and associated facilities?
Measure C Ravenswood City School District Bonds -- Ravenswood City School District (Bond (2/3 Approval Required))
4,174 / 85.7% Yes votes ...... 699 / 14.3% No votes: To increase student safety and improve learning by upgrading electrical wiring for computer use, heating and cooling systems, intercoms and fire alarms, lighting and security, removing asbestos and other hazardous materials from classrooms; relieve overcrowded campuses; expand classroom space by replacing 35-year old portable trailers and building additional classrooms and bathrooms; repair, acquire, construct and upgrade facilities and school sites, shall the Ravenswood City School District issue $10,000,000 bonds at interest rates within the legal limit?
Measure D San Mateo Union High School District Bonds For Repair and Renovation -- San Mateo Union High School District (Bond (2/3 Approval Required))
58,979 / 72.2% Yes votes ...... 22,730 / 27.8% No votes: To repair and rehabilitate school facilities to meet current health, safety and instructional standards, including replacing deteriorated plumbing, inadequate heating, ventilation, roofs, windows and lighting, refurbishing bathrooms, safety systems, classrooms, and computer and science laboratories, and to establish an independent oversight committee to guarantee that funds are spent only on school improvements, shall the San Mateo Union High School District issue $137,500,000 in bonds, at interest rates within the legal limit?

Home || San Mateo Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback || Donate to Us

Data Created: January 25, 2001 02:40
Smart Voter 2000 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 2000 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund http://ca.lwv.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.