This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/cc/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California
Smart Voter
Contra Costa County, CA November 7, 2000 Election
Measure T
Municipal Code Amendment - Legal Services
City of Pittsburg

7,928 / 54.7% Yes votes ...... 6,578 / 45.3% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

Shall the ordinance amending Chapter 2.08 of the Pittsburg Municipal Code by adding Section 2.08.031 providing for City Council control of the cost, standards and levels of legal services, and requiring the City Council to be responsible for maintaining the efficiency and effectiveness of legal services, be adopted?

Impartial Analysis from the City Attorney
(The following impartial analysis was prepared on behalf of the City of Pittsburg elections official by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP. San Francisco, California under special assignment. Normally, the impartial analysis of all City measures would be prepared by the City Attorney; however, because the subject matter of this initiative measure is the City Attorney's office, the City election official has determined to use outside counsel to prepare the analysis.)

Existing law allows the City Council to appoint a city attorney and to set the compensation of the city attorney. Under existing law, the city attorney is not required to be an employee of the City, but may be an independent attorney or law firm hired by the City Council. Existing law does not specify what budgetary or review process the City must follow with respect to the city attorney's office.

This measure would codify existing City of Pittsburg practice with respect to the city attorney's office, and would expressly give the elected City Council the authority to set standards and levels of legal services rendered to the City, to set budgetary and cost controls for such services and to maintain efficiency and effectiveness of all legal services and operations of the City. This measure would require the City Council to perform regular attorney performance reviews and to monitor work assignments and utilization of resources by the city attorney.

This measure would permit the City Council to either hire a full-time employee as city attorney or to contract for city attorney and other legal services and to specify maximum anticipated expenditures for legal services. The measure requires that the compensation paid to any individual attorney or law firm for providing legal services to the City be a matter of public record.

If enacted, this measure could only be repealed or amended by a vote of the people at a City election.

If both this Measure "T" and Measure "U" at this election pass:

  • If this Measure "T" receives more "yes" votes than measure "U" then Measure "T" will take precedence over Measure "U" and no portion of Measure "U" will become effective.
  • If Measure "U" receives more votes than this Measure "T", both measures will become effective except to the extent that any provision of Measure "T" is inconsistent with a provision of Measure "U", in which case the provisions of Measure "U" will take precedence and the applicable provisions of Measure "T" will not become effective.

The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure T. If you desire a copy of the ordinance or measure, please call the elections official's office at (925)252-4850 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.

 
Suggest a link related to Measure T
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure T Arguments Against Measure T
This measure allows for the most efficient and cost-effective method of providing legal services for the City of Pittsburg. The complexities of operating the City, Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority and Power Company require a wide range of legal expertise. Being able to contract for these varied needs gives the City the ability to hire the experts we need, but only when we need them. This flexibility is the key to maintaining costs for legal services at a reasonable level while not degrading the quality of service the City receives. This measure formally establishes funding accountability, cost effectiveness, quality review and use requirements for municipal legal services.

Comparable cities which utilize full-time city attorneys, requiring full-time support staff, full-time office space, complete legal libraries and in-house administration, pay substantially more for legal services than the current on-call contract method used by Pittsburg.

Employing a contract firm that has several attorneys specializing in various aspects of municipal law such as labor relations, eminent domain and land use has saved the City a tremendous amount of money in outside counsel fees. In fact our current system has led to a 62% overall reduction in total legal costs over the last seven years. The quality of legal service the City has received from the current contract city attorney has been the best available. Many of the benefits the City derived from the recent power plant projects can be directly attributed to the knowledge, experience, and negotiating skills of the current city attorney.

With a proven track record of protecting the City's vital legal interest, while providing Pittsburg with substantial economic benefits, the current contract method of providing legal service is clearly the best solution for Pittsburg.

Lori G. Anzini, Mayor

Robert T. Lewis, Vice Mayor

Ronald S. Currie, Mayor (retired)

Federal D. Glover, Councilmember

None Filed.


Contra Costa Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 25, 2001 02:34
Smart Voter 2000 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 2000 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.