|
Click on ballot measure for more detail.
- Measure A
-- City of El Cerrito
(Approved by two-thirds of the voters)
5,918 /
67.0% Yes votes
2,913 /
33.0% No votes
- Shall the City of El Cerrito impose a special tax in the
maximum yearly amount of $58.46 per single family residential unit, and
comparable amounts for multifamily and nonresidential property, collected
with the property tax, for up to 20 years, to renovate the Swim Center,
rehabilitate Canyon Trail Clubhouse, restore restrooms at Huber, Poinsett and
Harding Parks and establish a dedicated fund with yearly and mandatory
contributions from the general fund to maintain and replace city capital
facilities."
- Measure B
-- City of Oakley
(Majority Vote)
4,097 /
75.0% Yes votes
1,368 /
25.0% No votes
- Shall an ordinance be adopted to elect members of the
City Council of the City of Oakley at-large rather than by district?
- Measure C
Special Tax
-- Diablo Community Services District
233 /
46.2% Yes votes
271 /
53.8% No votes
- Shall Ordinance No. 99-47 of the Board of Supervisors of
Contra Costa County be approved so as to authorize a one-time special tax of
no more than $75 per residential property to fund the development and
consideration of a general plan amendment and zoning ordinance regulations to
establish in the Diablo Community Services District area a Floor Area Ratios
proportionality between houses and their lot sizes?
- Measure D
Advisory Measure
-- Diablo Community Services District
233 /
46.1% Yes votes
272 /
53.9% No votes
- Should the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors amend
the General Plan and the Zoning Code as they apply to the Diablo area to
adopt a Floor Area Ratio Ordinance substantially in the form mailed to the
Diablo residents on or about December 10, 1999, and a copy of which is
available for public inspection at the District 3 Supervisor's office 309
Diablo Road, Danville, CA, so as to provide proportionality between house and
lot size?
|
|
|
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.
|
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
