Stanislaus County Ballot

Combined ballot for all addresses

Polling Location on June 2:

Click on a contest name below to see more information.

Governor

• Gray Davis, Democratic
  1,934,216 votes 34.8% (57.6% in party)
• Dan Lungren, Republican
  1,877,789 votes 33.8% (93.4% in party)
• Al Checchi, Democratic
  701,648 votes 12.7% (20.9% in party)
• Jane Harman, Democratic
  682,241 votes 12.3% (20.3% in party)
• Dan Hamburg, Green
  84,411 votes 1.6% (100.0% in party)
• Dennis Peron, Republican
  66,737 votes 1.2% (3.4% in party)
• Steve W. Kubby, Libertarian
  43,691 votes 0.8% (100.0% in party)
• James D. Crawford, Republican
  27,087 votes 0.5% (1.3% in party)
• Charles "Chuck" Pineda, Jr., Democratic
  22,064 votes 0.3% (0.6% in party)
• Eduardo M. Rivera, Republican
  20,913 votes 0.3% (1.0% in party)
• Gloria Estela La Riva, Peace and Freedom
  20,058 votes 0.3% (58.1% in party)
• Jeff Williams, Republican
  18,314 votes 0.3% (0.9% in party)
• Nathan E. Johnson, American Independent
  18,155 votes 0.3% (100.0% in party)
• Marsha Feinland, Peace and Freedom
  14,491 votes 0.2% (41.9% in party)
• Harold H. Bloomfield, Natural Law
  11,539 votes 0.2% (100.0% in party)
• Pia Jensen, Democratic
  11,492 votes 0.2% (0.3% in party)
• Michael Palitz, Democratic
  11,283 votes 0.2% (0.3% in party)

Lieutenant Governor

• Cruz M. Bustamante, Democratic
  1,768,012 votes 34.1% (73.2% in party)
• Tim Leslie, Republican
  831,346 votes 16.1% (35.7% in party)
• Noel Irwin Hentschel, Republican
  672,807 votes 13.0% (28.9% in party)
• Richard "Dick" Mountjoy, Republican
  607,949 votes 11.8% (26.1% in party)
• Tony Miller, Democratic
  438,098 votes 8.5% (18.1% in party)
• Ingrid Lundberg, Republican
  217,382 votes 4.2% (9.3% in party)
• Larry K. Reed, Democratic
  210,434 votes 4.0% (8.7% in party)
• Sara Amir, Green
  138,635 votes 2.6% (100.0% in party)
• Thomas M. Tryon, Libertarian
  99,015 votes 1.9% (100.0% in party)
• Jaime Luis Gomez, Peace and Freedom
  71,494 votes 1.3% (54.1% in party)
• Regina Lark, Peace and Freedom
  60,688 votes 1.1% (45.9% in party)
• James J. Mangia, Reform
  39,472 votes 0.7% (100.0% in party)
• George M. McCoy, American Independent
  38,045 votes 0.7% (100.0% in party)

Secretary of State

• Bill Jones, Republican
  2,423,602 votes 50.1% (100.0% in party)
• Michela Alioto, Democratic
  1,896,245 votes 39.2% (100.0% in party)
• Gail K. Lightfoot, Libertarian
  171,344 votes 3.6% (100.0% in party)
• Jane Ann Bialosky, Natural Law
  96,560 votes 2.0% (100.0% in party)
• Carolyn Rae Short, American Independent
  76,813 votes 1.5% (100.0% in party)
• Valli Sharpe-Geisler, Reform
  61,999 votes 1.2% (100.0% in party)
• Israel Feuer, Peace and Freedom
  59,641 votes 1.2% (50.3% in party)
• Marisa Helene Palyvos-Story, Peace and Freedom
  59,124 votes 1.2% (49.7% in party)

State Controller

• Kathleen Connell, Democratic
  3,076,000 votes 59.5% (100.0% in party)
• Ruben Barrales, Republican
  1,690,653 votes 32.7% (100.0% in party)
• Pamela J. Pescosolido, Libertarian
  108,431 votes 2.1% (100.0% in party)
• Alfred L. "Al" Burgess, American Independent
  86,009 votes 1.7% (100.0% in party)
• Denise L. Jackson, Reform
  82,638 votes 1.6% (100.0% in party)
• C. T. Weber, Peace and Freedom
  70,201 votes 1.4% (100.0% in party)
• Iris Adam, Natural Law
  56,456 votes 1.0% (100.0% in party)

State Treasurer

• Curt Pringle, Republican
  1,392,604 votes 27.9% (62.1% in party)
• Phil Angelides, Democratic
  1,269,428 votes 25.4% (52.7% in party)
• Albert Robles, Democratic
  891,055 votes 17.9% (37.0% in party)
• Jan Goldsmith, Republican
  851,524 votes 17.1% (37.9% in party)
• Mervin Evans, Democratic
  248,476 votes 4.9% (10.3% in party)
• Jon Petersen, Libertarian
  119,112 votes 2.3% (100.0% in party)
• Jan B. Tucker, Peace and Freedom
  91,914 votes 1.8% (100.0% in party)
• Carlos Aguirre, Natural Law
  88,372 votes 1.7% (100.0% in party)
• Edmon V. Kaiser, American Independent
  50,792 votes 1.0% (100.0% in party)

Attorney General

• Dave Stirling, Republican
  1,497,336 votes 29.5% (66.6% in party)
• Bill Lockyer, Democratic
  1,198,119 votes 23.6% (47.1% in party)
• Mike Capizzi, Republican
  752,732 votes 14.9% (33.4% in party)
• Lynn Schenk, Democratic
  637,942 votes 12.6% (25.1% in party)
• Charles M. Calderon, Democratic
  605,767 votes 12.0% (23.7% in party)
• Michael K. Schmier, Democratic
  106,549 votes 2.1% (4.1% in party)
• Joseph S. Farina, Libertarian
  80,871 votes 1.5% (100.0% in party)
• Diane Beall Templin, American Independent
  72,579 votes 1.4% (100.0% in party)
• Robert J. Evans, Peace and Freedom
  68,656 votes 1.3% (53.8% in party)
• Gary P. Kast, Peace and Freedom
  58,983 votes 1.1% (46.2% in party)

Insurance Commissioner

• Chuck Quackenbush, Republican
  2,397,555 votes 47.8% (100.0% in party)
• Diane Martinez, Democratic
  1,251,999 votes 25.0% (57.5% in party)
• Hal Brown, Democratic
  926,213 votes 18.5% (42.5% in party)
• Dale F. Ogden, Libertarian
  122,615 votes 2.4% (100.0% in party)
• Barbara Bourdette, Natural Law
  105,976 votes 2.1% (100.0% in party)
• Gary R. Ramos, Peace and Freedom
  81,496 votes 1.6% (55.0% in party)
• Merton D. Short, American Independent
  68,029 votes 1.3% (100.0% in party)
• Tom Condit, Peace and Freedom
  66,870 votes 1.3% (45.0% in party)

State Superintendent of Public Instruction

• Delaine Eastin
  2,031,351 votes 43.0%
• Gloria Matta Tuchman
  1,209,616 votes 25.6%
• Barbara Carpenter
  613,661 votes 13.0%
• Mark Isler
  569,482 votes 12.0%
• Miles Everett
  304,456 votes 6.4%

State Board of Equalization; District 2

• Dean Andal, Republican
  683,756 votes 55.8% (100.0% in party)
• Tom Y. Santos, Democratic
  272,523 votes 22.2% (50.2% in party)
• Joseph F. Micallef, Democratic
  270,695 votes 22.0% (49.8% in party)

Federal Legislative Offices

United States Senator

• Barbara Boxer, Democratic
  2,389,595 votes 44.0% (92.1% in party)
• Matt Fong, Republican
  1,195,894 votes 22.0% (45.2% in party)
• Darrell Issa, Republican
  1,062,244 votes 19.6% (40.2% in party)
• Frank D. Riggs, Republican
  274,474 votes 5.1% (10.4% in party)
• John Pinkerton, Democratic
  205,371 votes 3.8% (7.9% in party)
• Ted Brown, Libertarian
  62,751 votes 1.2% (100.0% in party)
• Ophie C. Beltran, Peace and Freedom
  49,056 votes 0.9% (100.0% in party)
• John M. Brown, Republican
  46,246 votes 0.8% (1.7% in party)
• Timothy R. Erich, Reform
  42,458 votes 0.7% (100.0% in party)
• Mark Raus, Republican
  42,348 votes 0.7% (1.5% in party)
• Linh Dao, Republican
  26,661 votes 0.4% (1.0% in party)
• H. Joseph Perrin, Sr., American Independent
  22,581 votes 0.4% (100.0% in party)
• Brian M. Rees, Natural Law
  22,237 votes 0.4% (100.0% in party)

United States Representative; District 18 (Basic info only)

• Gary A. Condit, Democratic
  74,314 votes 89.1% (100.0% in party)
• Ken Aaroe, Libertarian
  9,169 votes 10.9% (100.0% in party)

State Legislative Offices

State Senator; District 12 (Basic info only)

• Dick Monteith, Republican
  74,269 votes 55.6% (100.0% in party)
• Sal Cannella, Democratic
  54,147 votes 40.5% (100.0% in party)
• Mary Lee Gowland, Libertarian
  5,342 votes 3.9% (100.0% in party)

Member of the State Assembly; District 25 (Basic info only)

• George House, Republican
  49,960 votes 63.1% (100.0% in party)
• Wesley Firch, Democratic
  26,056 votes 32.9% (100.0% in party)
• Leonard M. Surratt, Reform
  1,681 votes 2.1% (100.0% in party)
• Jonathan Ira Zwickel, Libertarian
  1,537 votes 1.9% (100.0% in party)

Member of the State Assembly; District 26 (Basic info only)

• Dennis A. Cardoza, Democratic
  32,662 votes 63.3% (100.0% in party)
• Patty Hollingsworth, Republican
  16,860 votes 32.7% (100.0% in party)
• David Eaton, Libertarian
  1,299 votes 2.5% (100.0% in party)
• Carl Towe, American Independent
  801 votes 1.5% (100.0% in party)

Proposition 219 Ballot Measures. Application.
3,265,978 / 67.0% Yes votes ...... 1,610,331 / 33.0% No votes

Requires statewide/local ballot measure to apply in all parts of jurisdiction, regardless of how parts of jurisdiction voted. Prohibits alternative versions of a measure from becoming law based upon specified vote percentage. Fiscal Impact: The number of measures this proposition would affect in the future, and the resulting fiscal impact, cannot be estimated.

Proposition 220 Courts. Superior and Municipal Court Consolidation.
3,213,798 / 64.4% Yes votes ...... 1,783,071 / 35.6% No votes

Provides for consolidation of superior and municipal courts in county upon approval by majority of county's superior and municipal court judges. Makes related changes to court system. Fiscal Impact: Potential annual net savings to the state, in the range of millions to tens of millions of dollars in the long term, to the extent that most superior and municipal courts consolidate.

Proposition 221 Subordinate Judicial Officers. Discipline.
3,958,652 / 80.8% Yes votes ...... 943,326 / 19.2% No votes

This measure grants Commission on Judicial Performance discretionary authority to discipline subordinate judicial officers according to same standards as judges, as specified, subject to review by California Supreme Court. Fiscal Impact: Probably minor, if any, costs to the state.

Proposition 222 Murder. Peace Officer Victim. Sentence Credits.
3,978,287 / 77.1% Yes votes ...... 1,188,113 / 22.9% No votes

Provides second degree murder of peace officer on duty is punishable by life in prison without parole where aggravating factors are present. Eliminates duplicative provision. Disallows person convicted of murder from earning credits to reduce the prison sentence. Fiscal Impact: Probably minor additional state costs.

Proposition 223 Schools Spending Limits on Administration.
2,393,361 / 45.6% Yes votes ...... 2,848,248 / 54.4% No votes

Prohibits school districts from spending more than five percent of funds from all sources for administrative costs. Authorizes fines for failure to comply. Fiscal Impact: Requires school districts to reduce administrative costs (as defined by the measure) by up to $700 million. To comply with this requirement, districts could more accurately account for administrative costs, move operations from central locations to school sites, and reduce administrative spending.

Proposition 224 State-Funded Design and Engineering Services.
1,936,722 / 38.1% Yes votes ...... 3,134,749 / 61.9% No votes

Imposes restrictions on state-funded design and engineering contracts. Requires cost comparison between private contractors and public employees performing work. Provides defined competitive bidding requirement. Fiscal Impact: Unknown impact on state and local government costs to obtain construction-related services. Impact would depend largely on factors included in required cost analyses.

Proposition 225 Limiting Congressional Terms.
2,689,045 / 52.9% Yes votes ...... 2,395,338 / 47.1% No votes

Establishes as California's official position that state and federal legislators support U.S. Constitutional amendment establishing Congressional term limits and requires them to use their powers to enact Congressional term limits. Fiscal Impact: Relatively minor costs to the state and to counties.

Proposition 226 Political Contributions By Employees, Union Members, Foreign Entities.
2,510,579 / 46.5% Yes votes ...... 2,880,855 / 53.5% No votes

Requires employee's or union member's permission to withhold wages or union dues for political contributions. Prohibits foreign contributions to state and local candidates. Fiscal Impact: Unknown, probably not major, state enforcement costs. Additional state costs (up to $2 million annually, one-time costs of $2 million to $5 million), offset by fees, and unknown local government costs for administrative activities, probably offset by fees.

Proposition 227 English Language In Public Schools.
3,345,481 / 61.0% Yes votes ...... 2,143,087 / 39.0% No votes

Requires all public school instruction be in English, unless parents request otherwise and show certain circumstances. Provides short-term English immersion programs for children learning English. Funds community English instruction. Fiscal Impact: Impacts on individual school districts would depend on how schools, parents, and the state respond to the proposition's changes. These impacts could vary significantly by district. Total state spending on education, however, probably would not change.